TED Conversations

Casey Christofaris

Owner, CS3 Inc

TEDCRED 10+

This conversation is closed.

Is our math wrong? Is it our assumption of zero, or absolute nothingness?

There are know phenomena out there such as the gamma ray burst that total destroys(use loosely your ego wants to argue this syntax error not the mind) our current math and physics(e=mc2). But instead of saying well maybe we got a key part of our math wrong we make it so the phenomena matches our math. This is my personal take on what I think might be wrong. I think it has to do with our assumption of zero. Seeing how you can never have absolute nothingness as a base or starting point. Conceptually the idea of zero is great. I want an apple. But i am in a complete void of apples. I don't have a single one. Not even applesauce! I have ZERO apples. But I do not need to know that you have zero apples to know when you have 1 apple. On the other had I do need to know that you have 1 apple to understand that now you have 2 apple. I could be wrong. It just something that bothers me.

Also I am not a math person it has always been something I struggled with in school those pesky numbers. However in College I excelled at Logic, but that has been some time ago.

I am not say this is the answer I just say that I think there is something fundamentally wrong with our math

Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Sep 22 2012: Zero or absolute nothingness are realities in that each person has the choice to exist or not. To choose not to exist results in not existing which means that there is not consciousness remaining with which to reverse the decision to not exist, thus one never comes back into existence.

    I committed suicide in 1618 and it took me until 1943 to reacquire a human body. When in my raging self hatred I blew my brains out with a pistol I thought I would go out of existence. I did not. What was left once my body was dead I could liken to a dust devil whirling and pitching out pieces of myself as I fragmented down into 'nearly' nothing.

    What remained of me was the consciousness that I still existed but with out substance. I could not find myself because I had no feeling of form as an anchor. A point has only location and no other quality. Only consciousness can occupy a point because consciousness is metaphysical and exists with out the need of any physical parameters.

    I have fragmented down to being the consciousness of a point. There was no place to go, nothing to feel other than the immeasurable conscious anxiety of absolute isolation. One choice remained. The choice to exist or not to exist. I was at the edge of absolute darkness, a darkness beyond the darkness I was already trapped in. I knew that if I chose to not exist I would vanish into that absolute darkness of nothingness.

    I could not make that choice and was left to resolve the remaining self hatred in my consciousness by forming a "pure" intent to exist.

    Once I formed absolute intent to exist with in all of the consciousness which remained as ‘me' I was then faced with the problem of how to come back into form. I pondered and worked at the problem for what seemed like a very long time until I came to the conclusion that I had to ask for help.

    Once I did ask, particles immediately began to coagulate in and around my consciousness and my journey back into human form began.

    ZERO IS NECESSARY IN MATH.
    • thumb
      Sep 22 2012: Good day to you John,

      That is an amazing storing, I feel like it belongs in another topic conversation that I started.

      http://www.ted.com/conversations/13896/do_we_think_as_a_being_whole_b.html

      So you are saying that if you chose not to exist you would of reach the zero point of consciousness?
      • Sep 22 2012: No, I found myself reduced to a point of consciousness. From the out side a point has location relative to other points. When one is the consciousness reduced to a point the experience is to have no location because there is no contact, experience or relevance to anything else (another point), other wise one would be at least in the second dimension defined as a line between two points.. One as consciousness reduced to a point thus experiences being no where while still existing.

        At this point, if one chooses to not exist, that is when one extinguishes to zero or absolute nothingness. Zero can not be a point because a point still has existence while not having form, only location.
        • thumb
          Sep 22 2012: I agree that zero has no point that is why I think we should get rid of it as a starting point of our current concept of math. ie, 0,1,2,3

          Since you are able to talk about it clearly and openly which I thank you. I have you been able to release the trauma that caused the suicide in the first place? How were you able to keep such a clear head and understanding of what happen to you? Did you open up your third eye to be able to see this unfold? Or was it always innately in you? If you would like to keep this more personal please feel free to email me at cs3@email.com
      • Sep 22 2012: Good point!

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.