# TED Conversations

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

## The events are not random.

Let us consider an 'event'. In this situation, a person 'x' decides to move slowly on the bike, as compared to his regular way. He reaches to a spot right at a moment when another bike suddenly comes out from a side way to the main road and is hit by a fast moving Jeep. The hitting of the bike caused the biker to fall and the stumbling bike hits the bike of 'x' and 'x' also falls down.

This event of accident is linked with the prior events on all the three individual involved. Suppose 'x' had not decided to ride slowly, he would have escaped the accident, which did not happen.

My point is, it was not possible in any way that 'x' could have escaped from the accident. Because it is the only event which could have happened and happened. There is no event happens which is independent and unaffected and hence random. Every event is linked like chain. Like the falling objects in a queue. If you have seen cycles stand, if one is fallen, the others keep falling, suppose there are 100 cycles stand side by side, the falling of 100th cycle can be result of falling of 1st cycle. The fall of the 100th cycle is not 'random'. but is caused by the falll on 1st cycle. So what about the first one?

That first one is the event Big Bang. which is a primary event, and route cause of every other events. If i say, in first example, the accident of 'x' was destined by Big-Bang, i dont think that i am saying something awkward.

if i try to look the first event of accident from microscopic scale, a lot of event happening simultaneously, the wheel is moving, breaks, noise, and so no...!

If i try to look all event from a macroscopic point of view, every event happening at any time 't' is actually one event, when we look outside from the world. Every one of us are working as a unit.

The future events have already been decided by the very first event and nothing is random.

Topics:
+1
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

• #### Gail .50+

• 0
Sep 15 2012: You speak of a purely mechanistic reality - something that a few physicists are exploring no matter how uncomfortable such a notion may make us feel.

I prefer to think of the originating singularity as a self-aware potential organism. It is aware of its existence, and aware of its potentials. Each potential particle and each potential particle within a potential particle is a self-aware potential that was seeking a way to explore its own potentials.

One moment before the Big Bang, there existed only potential, but one moment after, there existed time - meaning that there existed past, present, and future - for each now-existing being. Each being has the ability to make choices and learn from those choices, thus influencing future choices.

the 2nd view is a more organic view of reality than the purely mechanistic view. If all times exist in their potential (at the same moment), then we navigate time like a captain navigates a ship. The more we know, the more satisfying realities we navigate into. The less we know, the more troubled the waters. This inspires evolution.

Your worldview sounds impractical to me, though it is a rational extension of thought. It does conflict with my experience however. I also find it depressing, oppressive, and degrading. One may as well believe in God and give up on life.
• #### Simply Noor

• 0
Sep 17 2012: I was not upto God. Well, i thing saying that events are interconnected and generates due to a ceratain pattern, contradicts the Omnipotent God.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.