TED Conversations

Rick Ryan

TEDCRED 10+

This conversation is closed.

Why does the Universe look the same in all directions we look, considering an expanding Universe created by the Big Bang?

I've struggled to comprehend this. Looking away from the Earth, we are looking back into the history of the Universe's expansion since the Big Bang. Astronomers report that in any direction we look, at the farthest "distance and time" we can currently see, it appears there is a consistancy in what we see. Galaxies appear to be in the same "time state" of development, etc. If I carry this reasoning out to it's conclusion to where I can eventually see the edge of the Universe in all directions I look (assuming a finite Universe with a boundary), wouldn't that imply the Earth was actually at the center of the Universe? If the light coming back to me showing me the past is representing that in every direction I look I will see the same (time-wise) early state of the objects in the Universe, wouldn't I have to be in the center of it? If I wasn't centered, I should be seeing different "time states" of objects in the Universe depending on the direction I looked after the Big Bang expansion started.

I'm NOT asking this in a religious context. I'm NOT implying the Earth is actually in the center of our Universe to try to support any belief or faith. I'm looking for a theoretical physics explanation that will allow me to comprehend the observation without the Earth being centered in the Universe.

I just can't grasp the concept that if the Earth was a result of the Big Bang expansion, why does it LOOK like I'm in the center instead of off to the side closer to one edge of the Universe than the other? The probability of the Earth actually ending up in the center would be astronomical.

Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Sep 18 2012: Does the question assume that we are at the center of the universe?
    • thumb
      Sep 19 2012: I'm not sure if you were asking me your question (as the orginator of the topic), but no, it doesn't.

      Quite the opposite. I was asking why it would APPEAR we were in the center, as that just seemed astronomically incredible. As an aside, I'm agnostic, so I'm not trying to "prove" anything one way or another.
      • thumb
        Sep 24 2012: Hey Rick, Theodore,
        As far as APPEARANCE is concerned, I think it's an important observation that the night sky is mostly dark. If space were infinite (in Euclidean geometric terms) we would see an infinite number of stars which would cover every possible piece of sky.

        With every question and every answer, no matter how fleeting or partial, awe and wonder seem to be appropriate responses.

        mark
        • thumb
          Sep 24 2012: I was under the impression that was still considered a paradox and the fact the night sky was dark did not necessarily support a finite Universe. There is still debate about it.

          Am I missing something? Does it have to do with your condition of a Euclidean geometric observartion?

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olbers%27_paradox

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.