L. Denise Jackson

Founder & CEO,

This conversation is closed.

Do you think there is a benefit in providing a percentage of courses within every college free and online?

With the rising of educational costs and the competitiveness, the socioeconomic gap will continue to be wider unless there is a philanthropic mandate post-graduation to ensure that generations to come are not existing with a disconnected view of society and more importantly people that can contribute to our overall progression.

  • thumb
    Sep 2 2012: Yes. In fact, as listed below, there are some resources readily available and focused on independent learners! http://www.academicearth.org/ & www.http://ocw.mit.edu/ . I have found myself brushing up on certain subjects, as well as gaining perspective and insight on foreign subjects I would have otherwise not had the opportunity to explore. Perhaps the next step is to make independent learning viable in the workplace today, or perhaps it is the responsibility of the independent learner to utilize what they have learned themselves. As we live in this technological age, we have the great opportunity to expand the classroom from physical geological coordinates to the beautiful world wide web. TED.com itself has contributed greatly to this initiative! Let us feed the fire and keep it going!
  • Sep 23 2012: MIT and Yale and most likely many other credible universities and technical colleges have free courses. Of course you won't receive any credit for taking their free courses but the fact that the course are free and available to everyone is such a gift!
  • thumb
    Sep 19 2012: Yes, of course. And to go a step further, education should eventually be scaled up and open, like Wikipedia, to combine established information with new attempts at expanding knowledge.

    Our problem is that we rely in our institutional thinking on convergent thinking, but usually a better approach is divergent thinking, so instead of a constant stream of "not that, only this" we should experience an infinite expanse of "yes that, and that too, and that too, and that too" opening possibility after possibility. With increasing possibility comes real hope.
  • Aug 30 2012: There is http://www.academicearth.org/ which offers free online courses from MIT, Caltech, Harvard.
  • Aug 29 2012: I recently spoke with a friend who completed an online Stanford course on semantics and AI. The course was lead by one of the world leading researchers in this field. There were 160,000 participants from around the world. Only 22,000 completed the course. My friend was simply blown away with the calibre of the lecturer (delivered on-demand) and the interactive discussions with the brilliant participants. What terrific exposure for the professor and for Standford. This course was free.

    Can you imagine if Stanford had charged $5 for this course? (Potentially far more revenue/profit than a few dozen bums in a lecture hall.) Also, those 22,000 graduates from the course are prime recruitment candidates. How much do you think Google or Microsoft or Apple or others would pay to reach out to the top 10% of the class? What a terrific revenue potential for the school.

    Safeguards can be put in place to ensure academic freedom is strictly maintained, but free courses offered worldwide is definitely a realistic scenario if there's the strategic and political will.

    While I applaud and support the objective, I do not believe that philanthropy is the way to make it happen.
    • thumb
      Aug 29 2012: This sounds like Coursera, a great resource for the lifelong learner!
  • thumb
    Sep 25 2012: "What we are seeing is the education system (at least the higher education system) attempting to recreate itself. " ~Gordon Barker.

    I agree with Gordon Barker, and others, almost down the line about our educational system, especially in regards to our colleges and Universities and the impact the internet is having upon them as machines utilized to distribute and communicate knowledge.

    I believe Colleges and Universities are trying to recreate themselves in the same fashion as the Newspaper industry is actively doing today. This change is being forced upon these two communication machines, by the facility of the internet to shape and redesign everything that connects to it.

    People today can challenge themselves to become more than they are and apply this "free" education to everything they do in their day to day lives. Free education in any form benefits everyone. It's a win/win proposition with the capacity to pull everyone up the ladder of success wither that success is cooking a meal, learning how to write a novel, or installing a new front porch. The internet can, often, replace books and other learning material, even a whole University with it's extended reach into the lives of everyone.

    I read that a young man, still in high school, developed a test for cancer that only cost three cents per test and did a better job than similar methods, already being use by the medical industry. He discovered all the components and ideas necessary to develop this test using Google and the internet.

    That is one heck of a success story displaying how the internet could possibly bring a college degree or certification to anyone who desires it but, I must mention that the internet in it's present, unregulated form can do more harm to children than the opportunity it affords to educational institutions. A college campus, at least has some level of personal protection for the students. You can post an inappropriate link on the TED website and hurt children.



    '
  • thumb
    Sep 24 2012: Who's benefit you are speaking of? There is a reason the people are not offered online studies and degrees. I won't pretend to know the answer, but I will guess; if anyone could obtain any course and degree online it would kill the sports programs and that is probably the greatest opponent to ever seeing a common sense approach to online university studies and degrees. I think it would benefit anyone and everyone who desires to take the classes, it would also jeopardize the schools that have a master named profit and growth. I have known for years, most of the children of elementary, middle, and high school would not only be safer, with fewer dropouts, fewer teen age pregnancies, fewer shootings, rapes, etc., etc., it would save the economy an enormous amount of money and we would definitely have smarter, more intelligent children. If education would shift to online studies, more home schooling (with the scholastic material offered by the schools but online) smaller physical schools with much smaller operating costs, smaller utility bills, smaller food program costs, fewer buses, EVERYTHING! There is no good reason for us the people to continue the prehistoric education system we have now, if we are speaking of the benefits to us the people..... Not only are they entrenched into this society, no matter how grand of a failure they may have become, they are what fuel the sports programs which ultimately furnish ALL the participants in professional sports. Another needless industry in our the nation. Even though it is directly connected to your query, it is another subject and story altogether. Maybe if sports ever die out in this country, as I wish they would, and should, then maybe you will see the schools offer all the same classes and benefits of higher education online and at home. We may be correct thinking we have no need for the physical institution, we would be terribly mistaken to think they have no need of the physical us.
  • Sep 23 2012: There is a benefit for sure. I think it's a social imperative.
  • Sep 23 2012: Does anyone know any online colleges that are free?
  • Sep 22 2012: There is udacity.com where you learn by solving challenging projects. They offer courses mainly on computer science and engineering courses, but also some statistics and start-up business courses
  • Sep 22 2012: YES!!! Access to education is critical and a tool to empower people to explore their potential.
  • Sep 22 2012: Online schooling rocks. I can learn about any topic to any level I care or am able to.
    Coursa.org offers online stuff covering a large variety of simple to oh boy. Many others out there too.
    Ones who want knowledge can have it at their own pace with enough different explanations available online from such a variety of minds,one is sure to get it one way or another. People helping others. I like it.
  • thumb
    Sep 19 2012: of course we can benifit a lot from these courses.we can learn each other without considering some questions like the distances、money and ect.and we can choose what we like to learn rather than learn it implusively.
  • Sep 18 2012: What we are seeing is the education system (at least the higer education system) attempting to recreate itself.
    The current one was designed to fill a societial need when we had many workers with a few managers. Those people destined to be managers went to university.
    That need is now largely gone but the new need is not clear (at least to me).
    This is a transition phase that will eventually find a way to fund itself (30 people paying $3000 per online course or 90,000 people paying $1 for the same course with a global audience makes the same sense financially.
    It will just take time for the system to settle out the payment methods, delivery and certification methods.

    To validate who is actually logging on, I have seen some research that can identify a user based on the speed and pattern that they enter their passwords, where pauses are and where bursts of speed are seen.
  • Sep 18 2012: Yes.Absolutley critical. .No transportation,distance or scheduling problems.No discrimination.There are not as many social distractions online.


    Will tradtional classrooms become obsolete? Lots of cost ,time and resource disadvantages. Will the next generation of SIRI or IBM's Watson know a better answer to your question than your professor?

    And if takes dictation and types PDF will you be able to ...
  • Sep 18 2012: I agree that it should be free but not online. because, you could people registering for the courses, but let other do it for them.
    if it's going to be online; then stringent measures have to be put in place to make sure all rules and regulations on those courses are followed.
  • thumb
    Sep 18 2012: With the number of universities offering free online classes trending upward (without regards to speed), I think the question is not "is there a benefit" because undoubtedly an educated populace is preferable, but is online the best method of receiving that end. I personal go to a "brick and mortar" university and I feel that there are learning and social aspects that you miss by only or mostly doing online classes. A few of those aspects being team work, the need to become global citizen, how to successfully manage time in unpredictable environments, and the like. Now, I do completely agree that rising tuition cost for higher education is ridiculous ( I mean debt for higher education eclipses credit card debt) and needs to be either be state or federally managed, but that's not going to happen only through free online class offerings.
  • Sep 15 2012: Bringing down the cost of education is always a good thing.
  • thumb
    Sep 15 2012: To be it will surely be beneficial to provide free access of the world's finest college's courses to everybody in the world. It's flexible, efficient and durable.

    But the problem always remains about whether some colleges will be willing to participate or someone might take advantage of this program to make a huge profit.
  • thumb
    Sep 15 2012: i don't know wha you are saying.now every day we surf the internet.it is enough,i think we should do something .no class.but practise.you konw we are reducing our time of outdoors.i don't think it benifit to our health,so sometimes out .and do .oh my god.what am i saying !
  • thumb
    Sep 15 2012: It is beneficial for educational institutions to provide a percentage of their courses free and online.
    Online learning has its inadequacies; some fields need practical learning(pilots,doctors); the academic community is also an important part of learning(learning all alone with the computer will never be a good replacement for one-on-one interactions with other learners)

    But what can be learnt with the free online resources should be learnt.
    Imperfect learning/education is better than ignorance/illiteracy.
  • thumb
    Sep 12 2012: It's getting harder to come up with a better joke on the job while installing a new roof because most of the guys have direct contact to the best jokes in the world online.

    The average roofer has seen more videos on how to install a roof, what tools to use and better ways to achieve result because of the internet. It's getting harder to find people in common labor jobs who have not learned something on the internet these days. In other words, people are more educated and knowledgeable about their jobs because of the internet.

    As long as the internet is free there will not be a disconnected view of society. Most people will be on top of just about everything. The socioeconomic gap will continue to be wider because of economic issues not related to educational access. You don't need a degree to create and develop a business or manufacturing process that will enable you to hire people with degrees to do all the head work. I know of a few business owners who built a Midwifery clinic, had only a high school education and employes doctors nurses and midwives with masters degrees.

    It' just business. What should be of more concern is will a more educated population who learn for free on the Internet bring down the cost of professional salaries because they can preform the same work with the help of a computer and will work for less than those with a degree. Will industry want to hire these people who can cheaply and easily get certification in their chosen field?

    I see the gap closing.
  • thumb
    Sep 11 2012: I think that with the rising cost of education, more people would turn to free online education and realize that it's actuallly pretty damn good.
    • thumb
      Sep 15 2012: I think there is an important distinction to be made here. On-line learning is great for being educated on quick ideas or demonstrations of certain skills. True knowledge and education comes after synthesizing information, considering options and developing a personal theory. This is often aided by discussion and debate. Unfortunately, the later is not ideally suited for on-line academic experiences.
      • thumb
        Sep 15 2012: On the contrary, a ton of discussions and debates are held online. And the medium of an online forum has a ton of advantages over the medium of a real-life debate such as...

        1) Accessibility
        You can have discussions without your physical presence

        2) Continuity and Getting all ideas across in a single post
        You can have a discussion without people interrupting you before you even express your points

        3) Multi-linearity
        The discussions can be multi-linear where you have sub-threads of a discussion within a discussion and still be "heard" by all.

        In a face-to-face real life discussion, a forum or even a chat messaging platform is not ideal because the face-to-face talk is much faster at communicating ideas to/from each person, and you can also communicate not only through voice, but through body language, eye contact, facial language, or even drawing/showing physical objects/ideas to one another.

        To say that discussion and debate is not suited for online academic experiences is a weird statement, because having online discussions and debates is different from real life debates and they are inherently suited for different kinds of discussions/debates. Unless you were referring to the quality and the quantity of the learning experience.
        • Sep 15 2012: You can ahve discussions, but you do need human instructors in fields like medicine and the exact sciences, still, online material always helps.
        • thumb
          Sep 15 2012: It depends whether the on-line format is based on real time or not. Those discussions that allow others to comment over time with the capability of responding to earlier comments may be more alligned to what you outline. Unfortunately, many real-time videos on-line or copies of lectures given durng a course are limited and exclude the person watching from home from entering into the discussion. Learning comes from the latin word for "draw out". Too often we think of education as "stuffing in" information.
      • thumb
        Sep 15 2012: @John

        True, which subject benefits more from the different media of discussions is dependent on the subject itself.

        For something like Computer Science, you really don't need human instructors as much as most other subjects.
      • thumb
        Sep 15 2012: @Joseph

        Hmm, I'm not sure I know what you're referring to. If you're talking about online videos that imitate real world lectures, then I agree that it's not that great of a way to learn, but this is not because it's online that it's not good, it's because the lecture model itself is just not good. I mean I've been to many lectures the model of single sender to multiple receivers is inefficient for a lot of comprehensive learning. The lecture model can only really be most effective if the lecturer is great.
  • Sep 10 2012: Yes I do agree, but where is the profit in that?
    So do you think it’s going to happen?
    I do think it should, but in this day and age most but not all people think more about the value of money than any gaps that maybe appearing or need filling within society.
  • Sep 10 2012: thank you
  • Sep 3 2012: Dear Maria
    Am far to liberal and scientific to say 'doing that for years'. And fresh ideas are not limited to the young, I have them every day and with my experience in life have more than the young have.
    And as for free on line teaching check out the Khan Academy web site, thy go far beyond just free teaching.
  • thumb
    Sep 3 2012: No benefit at all except a personal benefit of completion. The biggest problem with online courses is that anybody can be sitting at that computer answering questions and watching videos.

    Just because I registered for the course does not mean that I took it. I could pay someone to sit at the computer and answer questions for me. However, there would be some new employment opportunities...
    • Sep 15 2012: "I could pay someone to sit at the computer and answer questions for me."

      Just as in regular collegewhere you can pay someone to make your assignments and take home exams.
  • Sep 3 2012: The MIT and similar offerings are great.

    And you're right, the student doesn't get his/her ticket punched as having attended MIT or wherever.
  • Sep 2 2012: Nothing's "free."

    Every online course requires an instructor to lead, grade and administer the course. That teacher commonly does not donate his/her time. They expect to be paid for their work.

    If the student does not have to pay for that particular course then the money to offer the course must come from another source such as higher tuition or higher taxes.

    SOMEbody's "gotta" pay.
    • thumb
      Sep 3 2012: Hey Jim,

      While you are correct in that the professors do need to be paid, the great thing about MIT OpenCourseWare is that they are video recorded lectures, syllabi, and notes that are simply put online for independent learners or people who were unable to go to a university for a multitude of reasons. It's great! Why would anyone pay for school then you ask? Well, the disadvantage of OCW is that you do not have contact with the professor for questions or explanations (generally). Completing courses 'independently' is not recognized in a certifiable way. It is also quite a different learning environment all together, you have to be strict on yourself to do the work, as no one will be checking it, there simply will be no grades. While avenues of ''free'' learning cover the most essential component in giving an opportunity to increase knowledge; they perhaps do not give the prestige or credibility that going to a university would, which might result in lesser potential to carry forward the knowledge in a corresponding subject-area job or in graduate study.
    • thumb
      Sep 12 2012: I learned to be an excellent computer programmer checking out books for free at the library. Well, they weren't entirely free. The taxpayer paid for them and the publisher paid the author. I also had to build my own computer because there weren't any ti purchase in any of the stores.

      Most of the people who learned to program at college, who didn't already have loads of experience from practicing at home made pretty poor programmers. They usually ended up in sales and managing projects.

      To learn to program requires a lot of time and occupying space with your fingers and your mind. Starting to learn this useful art when you enter college is a bit too late to compete with those who started when they were 12 years old at home.

      The software industry doesn't need prestigious programmers they want coders who can follow directions and code the work. Prestige goes to the boss, who probably dropped out of college to pursue his grand idea.

      To be medical doctor, you have to go to medical school but to be a good doctor you have to spend a lot of time in the emergency room and on the floors, making mistakes. That's a scary thought.

      What they have today I didn't have is online MIT, video lectures, and access to programing materials all over the net. The gap between needing a college education to accomplish most projects today is reduced by the computer which does most of the processing with logic and math. Spending more time at home with Mathcad an adequately designed program manual and access to people who can guide you and critique your work will create more mathematicians than college.

      The only thing keeping these people out of the work force is the requirement for a college degree, which is swiftly being replaced by the Certification process.
  • Aug 30 2012: Wow what a great resource. Thanks very much for the tip!

    I guess the original point I was trying to make is that free and online courses can be funded by corporations and that this could be a very lucrative opportunity for universities to expand their brand and global reach while also increasing revenues (and without compromising accessibility). A real win/win.
    • thumb
      Sep 12 2012: Combine that with the opportunity to take a test and get the prestigious degree would be big winner. Imagine, spending all your time at home studying and taking a test that says you graduated from Harvard.

      Why do we even need the degree? Certification is the best route for industry to hire qualified people cheaper. Most projects are so large these days that specialization, and the ability to become specialized in more areas of industry is what is needed most. I think the avenues used to deal with the Haitian earthquake incident reveals this need. They needed to get the specialists, medical, water, housing, transportation, energy, to the sites of greatest need and I understand it was done by just a few people and some computers, in under 50 hours.
  • thumb
    Aug 30 2012: The question is will people take advantage of it if it were free? I think those who desire an education will find a way to acquire it. And I believe there are many options that currently exist for those specific individuals to obtain an education.
    • Sep 1 2012: I think that you bring up some great points, but if the classes were truly free easily accessible, I don't know if it matters how many people take advantage of it because even if just one person were more interested in learning and acquiring knowledge wouldn't that already be worth it? I think that offering this is great and it should be available and made public. I had no idea that there were free online courses offered from those Universities and I consider myself pretty "hungry for knowledge". TED talks are also great for learning about new things and they can also be accessed for free, as long as you have a computer with internet.
    • thumb
      Sep 12 2012: Yes, this is the real question. I agree entirely with Lacee Sherman's comment. And it brings up a question of an old project to put computers in the hands of every child. What happened to that project?
  • Aug 30 2012: No, not if it's gaming the system - ultimately you more or less get what you deserve.

    There is potential here and there is no reason high school should be exempt from this avenue of learningl, or a prison for that matter.

    In order to recognize student academic achievement for a given courrse at a given time, which has been truly earned demands more than smiles. It must operate with credible controls. Some independent operation (already mentioned). Perhaps is could be made commenserate with the institutional standard method via some independent staff and facility, suppose:

    The online class is certified from the high school or college institution, etc. Students then registerer the start and completion dates for the course and are bound by set timetables and instructions.

    Students take tests at a specified time including a final examination at a certified location. The final exam is sealed coming and going with a set time for completion and the posting of results.

    Students pay a fee for the facility including the sargent of arms, testing and grading experts. Academic achievement is measured by a grade A through F.

    To become an accredited course on a student's academic record a certified test location, process, and personnel need to be adequate and professional.

    Done right I would have no problem with someone getting a basic degrees online. It could be considerably less expensive than the standard method and offer more choices. Online classes can be demanding and what a solid education is all about.

    But nothing worthwhile is free in my experience.
    • thumb
      Sep 12 2012: It is interesting to note that when I worked with some young prisoners (they like the term inmate), so they could get their GED, they had almost no skills at all in writing or math. What was more interesting is the rate they learned the material and accomplished their goal, under pressure of the prison environment. Most of these kids were very smart; so smart they didn't believe they needed an education to make money.
      • thumb
        Sep 12 2012: I have also worked with a lot of people of all ages, mostly homeless, on GED. Sometimes between the time they were in high school and the time I saw them, learning that content became their own objective rather than that of a higher authority. Other times they were the victims of schools unresponsive to their needs and were getting on board to try again in a more hospitable, more personalized environment.
        • thumb
          Sep 12 2012: This is my opinion also.
          I often asked myself, how could such a smart kid not learn to read and write? Is it the fault of the school system or the living environment of the kid. They learned very quickly and everyone I taught ranked high on the GED score. I'm a bit tougher than most. I start off math with fractions. It's hard but once the see the light and master simple addition, subtraction, multiplication and division of fractions they tend to zoom through everything else with ease.
  • thumb
    Aug 29 2012: I believe all education should be absolutely free. In one of TED talks (don't remember which one), the speaker explained how our ability to communicate is the ground for progress of our society.
    Everyone should have access to knowledge, universities, museums, internet...
    Can you imagine how many Einsteins did we lose because they couldn't get an education.
  • Aug 28 2012: Sometimes I use YouTube to educate myself. A worldwide commitment on this topic will be great.
  • thumb
    Aug 28 2012: In several countries education is completely free - benefiting society by having more people in education and more people working. And thereby paying back their fees through taxes.
    • Aug 29 2012: Our contry has so called free education system. But it is not as shiny as it looks at first glance. Through your lifetime you more than pay for your school through several taxes. They may look small in monthly amount of money paid for it - but in a lifetime the amount gets quite big, And that can be also problem for people who do not even use the possibility of schooling and do not go to any school after primary. They actually pay the study for others without any direct profit for them (There can be an indirect --> as you said society benefits by having educated people in their country).
      • thumb
        Aug 29 2012: In Scandinavia education if free, and most people (around 80%) takes at least High school/college or equivalent.
        It is mandatory to attend school (or be home school and pass exams) from approx. 6 till 15-16 years old.

        I do believe the high percentage getting degrees or diplomas/certificates is due the education being free.
        This allows children from all walks of life to get an education and is a big part of creating a stable economy.

        I do believe other countries would benefit from free education for all. And pay through taxes.
        Education benefits us all, and we all benefit whether directly or indirectly.
        • thumb
          Aug 29 2012: In the United States we have free public education as well through what is called twelfth grade. It is mandatory to attend school here also until about age fifteen or sixteen, I think, but families can also choose to homeschool their children.
    • Aug 29 2012: can you help me please to improve my english?
  • Aug 28 2012: I think it is a very good idea to do this. And not because of the price factor.

    If some kid reads about or tries a course or part of a course and that sparks interest, then it has paid for itself
  • thumb
    Aug 27 2012: My university did not offer every course I wanted to take so in the summers when my kids were home full time I took a couple of online courses on letters of permission from my university at the University of Ottawa. I look back at them and I know that they added to my strengths and definately encouraged organization, computer skills, different sorts of organization and time management. I was greatly enriched by taking these courses and I think I took three over the course of my undergrad degree. I paid full price for these.
  • thumb
    Aug 27 2012: I don't know that every college should need to get involved in this, but it is terrific that such a large number of great universities have, either by posting lecture notes and videos online on their own websites or by joining up with EdX or Coursera.
  • Sep 26 2012: I am talking about my country INDIA. Though the government claims 100% literacy in the country, there are still some pockets which are poverty ridden. Children from these places go bear footed to colleges especially girls. Its a very pathetic situation. Even to date some children are working for a living when they are supposed to be studying. So if education is free upto the level of Masters Degree, the deserving shall be very gratefull for those creators and initiators of this policy. Care should be taken in parting with cash to individuals who tend to help the needy, destitute women and orphan children seeking help in higher studies. There greedy men who pocket the money and goodies which come from uk, usa, etc. in the names poor children. I have heard of man who used sell milk powder received freely from denmark which otherwise should have been given to the poor children & women who are supposed to be under his care. Well there is a cancer called corruption which exists in every country and shields some of these humans(monsters) who should have been lawfully punished. This story is approximately 40 years old. Corruption is like a lemon which has been pickled. Lemon is our world and the pickle is the saucy corruption. Once the corruption is erradicated, we can imagine real free education. Because in our country if somebody has anounced a free gift, you got to pay the concerened authorities to enjoy the freebee. Happy Conversing! God Bless us all.
  • thumb
    Sep 26 2012: Yes in every way except for economically and moraly to those who pay for and administer the classes being the universities and their students, but they are smart enough to know how important somehthing like this is consider COURSERA.ORG
  • Aug 29 2012: The industry tends to reduce costs on their operations by establishing "Standard Operation Practices".
    Maybe this concept can be applied to the education process. Something like "Technology Assisted Standard Teaching Practices" can be developed to make education accesible for everyone.
  • thumb
    Aug 29 2012: I have a disconnect probem with the subject and the explaination. I will address the title. People that believe any thing a college does is free is not well informed. You can take a course on line but you will not get credit for it unless you pay the fees. The new on line thing at Stanford offers a certificate of completion and that is about as close as you are going to get in the US.

    Answer: Would benefit you in cost savings. Would never happen in a college setting. They are selling a product. You want the sheepskin you pay up.

    Bob.
    • thumb
      Sep 13 2012: As a businesman, I'm more concerned with competence than I am certification. Knowledge without application is not worth the paper it's printed on. I'm all for free education, when's lab?
  • Aug 29 2012: A lot of universities and bodies are already doing that, there is Cousera and MIT, which offer free courses. Also Antioch College in Yellow Spring, Ohio, is offering free tuition to all students who enroll in the college in the next three years.

    At anytime, anyone can go online and equip themselves on various informational tools at any time from one of these sources and the web in general, you tube, etc. But the question still remains, how can one get free online certified education.
  • Aug 29 2012: Perhaps a reduced fee - I think that all the required general edcuation courses should less expensive and as much as possible - online. I feel that we do not work for a college degree for the general subjects - while there is value there in the general studies, our goals are usually well defined and the generals are the 'grunt work' required to get to our ultimate goal. The greater value is in the specific classes that get you to your chosen proffession/subject matter.

    On the other hand - people esteem lightly that for which they do not pay - some sort of balance twixt cost and ease is needed. Last - the buy one get one apprach has merit - it could very easily grow the base and increase revenue at the same time. Cell phone companies have been using bundleing techniques for years.....
  • Aug 29 2012: Yes. If some classes were offered free and on line, it would be the equivalent of getting a buy one, get one free promotion for that particular college. Traffic into that school would increase, people that never of thought they would like the product would try it, parents would definitely direct their undecided children there and viola, more people would be spending their money there. It's a great marketing promo that introduces and spreads knowledge. Good luck with your idea!
  • Aug 29 2012: Free? Moneyless society? I wonder how this could be implemented. How would persons creating/developing course materials be compensated for their work to provide others a free education? Would you compensate those persons who manage the online resources? Would you compensate those developing research from which course materials are written? How far up the line should people not be compensated so that you could have a free education? Would other people need free services so they can live and feed families so that you could have your free resources?

    Difficult for me to imagine a moneyless society. Does moneyless mean no form of any compensation?

    If we ask for free education, then what else should be free to those who receive a free education?

    Free. Who would control the quality of a free education?

    Wow! People could ask a lot of questions about how to do this and what would be the result.

    What would you do with a free education? Would you offer your services free to others coming up behind you?

    I need help to visualize how to get a free education and then live life thereafter.
  • Aug 28 2012: I agree with your thoughts but from a different perspective. I'm 66 years old and would not mix well with young students at a school even though I can well afford it monetary wise. One line I can continue learning until ether my mind or body goes. Though I do have the money, free for all on line would be the best solution.
    • thumb
      Aug 29 2012: I like this perspective, and thought the same thing myself. But then, when I sat in classes with younger students, it opened my eyes to fresh ideas. Now, it's hard to be around "mentors" who tend to say, "this is the way we've been doing it for years." I can't relate to that mode of thinking anymore.

      As far as online goes, a free-for-all model would water down the curriculum, I'm afraid. I received my undergrad from a public institution, and now I am enrolled in classes at a private institution. I already see a world of difference in terms of the quality of education I'm receiving. Free generic skills-based learning is good, but how does a free class master the art of social action and community development? You have to roll up your sleeves and get out there and do it if you want to really learn from it.
      • Aug 30 2012: I agree with the fresh ideas a young student would have, it's the their social behavior I could not take. And the free internet teaching I only meant it for me and ones like me. At this time in life I just want to learn more on many subjects for my personal satisfaction.
  • thumb

    Gail .

    • 0
    Aug 28 2012: I believe in a moneyless society and free education for all at any age with no limits except those the individual imposes on themselves by virtue of lack of intellectual curiosity. Thanks to the Internet, free (uncertified) educations are available to all. we need to devise a system of free certification.
    • thumb
      Sep 3 2012: Corporate Sponsorship?
      • thumb

        Gail .

        • 0
        Sep 3 2012: Compulsory education is a step-child of corporate interests, and is responsible for all that is wrong with education today. It is nothing more than a corporate subsidy, and it's stated purpose was to create workers - and (according to Rockerfeller who helped establish it) NOT educated people.

        The reason that the global economy is in such fragile state today is because of the banksters who have joined with corporations. If you put the military industrial complex in charge of education, paying only for certain types of education that they will sponsor, you will see more of what is happening today. We are being educated more and more and fewer and fewer things. That's dangerous. It produces functionally uneducated graduates.
        • thumb
          Sep 3 2012: Thank goodness. I was worried. I was thinking about all the continuing education I have had. The only education that was free was always corporate sponsored. Many times, if you wanted a certificate, you had to pay a minimum amount, like $50. If you wanted academic credit, it would cost over $1000. All for the same course. So the only way I know that we could have free online education is with some type of sponsorship. I agree that corporate sponsorship is a bad idea. Government? Philanthropic?

          Just remember, at least in the US, the person who pays, says.