TED Conversations

  • James Ada
  • Gold Coast City, Queensland
  • Australia

This conversation is closed.

Georg Cantor was wrong about infinity. Greatest Mistake in History True Infinity explained

Infinity - boundless endless = ∞
Mathematics/universe - bound end = ()

Cantor said ( ∞ )
Greatest Oxymoron in existence

Cantor did find something, however it is not Actual infinity.

What he found:
The infinite possibilities within the core of our numerical system, the Number 1.

ALL types of numerical expressions, be it fractions, decimal points, percentages, whole numbers etc are different ways of expressing this one number. Hence, 
What Cantor perceived to have found = ( ∞ ), an infinite restricted by time and space
What Cantor actually found = ( 1 ). 

Now to what I found about the number 1 in finite. (1)
There are many ways to express mathematics, but what is the core?
x, ÷ , √ , Etc are grouped and fancy symbols explaining the only two symbols. + and  -.
Every mathematical expression can be explain by these two symbols. Remembering maths is finite, this numeric 1 is comprised of or subject to 

( + | - )
This is Theory of Everything.


Quantum Mechanics states for nothing to create something, laws must be in place for nothing to produce something.

How do you explain this. Easy....

+ ( + | - )
This is the link between Quantum Mechanics and Gravitational Physics.

Even a law however is not nothing, but something. It is an action and must proceed an entity.

1 + ( + | - )

What is 1 added onto finite or 1 added onto Mathematics as the equation shows.

It is ∞.
1 + ( + | - ) = ∞
The Actual True infinity

This means
If we add 1 onto finite addition itself, we have infinite positive and respectively 1 added onto subtraction itself, infinite negative
1 + (+) = + ∞ 
1 + (-) = - ∞ 

Religiously what does this mean?

God (1) created (+) everything ((+|-)) and after judgement day (=), depending on our free will choices, we could end up in either heaven ( + ∞) or hell ( - ∞ ).

Please watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpVHJJMxZa8 to understand the theological aspect of equation.


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Jon Ho

    • 0
    Aug 26 2012: Wow! There is so many things wrong with your theories... Where do I begin? Hmmm..

    Ok, first. Mathematics is NOT bound. Order theory, a branch of logical mathematics that deal with upper and lower bound is just a sub-'set' of it.

    Second, after reading your hypothesis and watching your video, I've concluded that you are stating the exact same thing as Cantor and his theory of Actual Infinity. Huh?

    The third and final thing is... I hope by Zeus that you are a REAL mathematician and not some bloke who randomly surfed a Wikipedia page and then decided to make a Youtube video out of it.

    Why? Because what Cantor proposed, and basically what you proposed, is an idea where any attempt at a definition will simply lead to contradiction. I mean does the uppermost infinity and lowermost infinity even makes sense?

    Here's some simple equations to help you out:
    ∞ + 12 = ∞
    ∞ * 131567.121313 = ∞
    ∞ / 12.892 = ∞
    ∞ - 789.2324 = ∞
    ( ∞ ) = ∞

    Notice the last equation? Get the picture?

    Here's question, how do you divide by 0? Like, how do you solve this equation:
    12 / 0 = ?

    You can't, because it is basically a contradiction! Read here http://www.math.utah.edu/~pa/math/0by0.html for more info about the mathematical theory of contradictions.
    • Aug 28 2012: I apologies for the numerical response

      1. Mathematics is restricted by the number 1. As I stated before all we have in our numeric system. It either exists, even for calculating purposes can  be created by imagination or it doesn't exist. You can go as far as to say even the things/value/entity we imagine are restricted by what the individual has experienced. This means time becomes another major restriction of what we can contemplate or that exists.
      Also Mathematics is the art of deriving a final outcome. It is not the subset. Everything is dependent on Maths.
      Therefore  It is restricted by time and space. Our current mathematics only exists because of these fundamental properties and the number 1.

      2. Cantor stated that we can have infinite possibilities within the finite. What he really was studying was the infinite possibilities within the only number, However my argument is we can only have infinite outside of finite.

      3. All this comes solely from me and is not taken from any other. Not wikipedia or any other source.
      When it comes to deciphering logic it doesn't matter what your academic background is, look at the greatest mistake from Cantor ( ∞ )

      In regards to your comments about contradiction, firstly all those different values are a part of the number 1 or derived from it.

      I should state You are correct in your equations. The only problem is all your proving wrong is not me but Cantor. Again my equation shows that the infinite is equal to 1 outside of finite and existed before us and will after.
      Cantor ( ∞ )
      Me 1 = ∞ outside of ()

      In other words all those different variants you mentioned in your examples are again only exaggerating the core, the Number 1 within finite (1) and it restricted by mathematical law (+|-).

      Thank you for your criticism
      • Jon Ho

        • 0
        Sep 2 2012: ∞ = ∞, there is no ∞ outside of ()

        ∞ is not equal to (1)

        there is no -∞ or +∞ because, again
        ∞ x 1 = ∞
        ∞ * (-1) = ∞

        There is no heaven or hell infinity... and personally, I wouldn't even go there, no sir, ain't gonna touch that with a 10 foot pole hahaha ;)

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.