- Charu Consul
- New Delhi
- India
This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
If Cricket is to be played at the Olympics, what should be the format for the game? T20 or 50-50?
Cricket is still not a GLOBAL game! But it's growing for sure. If cricket was to become a part of the Olympics, which I feel it must be; then a question or challenge in our hands is the right format for it!
I think T20 can be a good option and include the game at the Olympics, however would love to read further comments and views.













Feyisayo Anjorin 50+
T20 means there will be more competitors and more time.
T50? NO!
Obey No1kinobe 50+
Even the tennis and soccer is stupid in my view. The olympics is a side show for these sports.
peter lindsay 30+
Jay Kumar Pradhan
Charu Consul
Jay Kumar Pradhan
I am for T-25. The balls per over be reduced to 3 balls per over to give enough time to bowlers especially the fast bowler to bowl with full thrust. Now this is skewed in favour of batsman. Five more overs will give a chance to batsman down under the chance to score. Further 5 more overs will means extra 5 overs for slog in the end overs.At least three runs be given for if the catch is near the boundary line. the boundary should be colored with two different bright colors. The width of boundary line be of 6+6=12 inches. Lastly it should be played in indoor stadium so that the game can be played anytime even during rainy season.
Charu Consul
Interesting new format that you propose there! I specially like the 'you get 3 runs if caught at the boundary' one!