TED Conversations

griffin tucker

TEDCRED 10+

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

leaders: emotional intelligence

do leaders experience emotions?

some would say that leaders are required to have little or no emotions so that they can react to situations and make decisions quicker with-out the need to consider how they feel about a situation, so that they may make quicker decisions that could, effectively, change the outcome of a decision to the point of saving lives.

some would say having little or no emotions is cold-hearted, but it has been getting us by in the world so far, albeit some would say emotions are required for everyone, but the leaders of our world would either not be aware they have little or no emotions, or be aware of it and deny that functional part of their mind.

on the other side, it is almost impossible to say what the world would be like if everyone was in touch with their emotions.

would it be riskier to put someone in charge who is highly emotionally charged?

do leaders have time-out where they explore their emotions? should they?

+1
Share:
progress indicator
  • Aug 19 2012: You don't seem to be a leader of any kind. First and foremost, leaders are humans, something you don't seem to know. So leaders feel emotions.

    Your question shows that you have no meaning for a larger group of people.
  • thumb
    Aug 14 2012: Well if David and Dr Ghaemi are right explains why Aussie pollies are so useless they are not as batty as we all thought they were???? :-)
    • thumb
      Aug 14 2012: i'd say everyone has their place in the world, mathematically speaking :-P
      • thumb
        Aug 14 2012: Ahh you are with the Dept of Stats ;-)
        • thumb
          Aug 14 2012: might as well be, but no. let me guess, you're a gemini.
      • thumb
        Aug 14 2012: Not even close if I was I could claim split personality and challenge Julia ( bad joke) anyway my apologies I didnt mean to hijack your thread. Look forward to seeing the imput and thoughts others have . Thanks for the fun

        Take Care.

        Morgan
        • thumb
          Aug 14 2012: i figure i had a 1 in 12 chance. was worth a shot.

          seeya around.

          -griffin.
  • thumb
    Aug 14 2012: In the book "A First-Rate Madness" Dr. Nassir Ghaemi, there is a very coherent argument made, which may inform this discussion. In studying the memoirs of Ghandi, Churchill, Lincoln, Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr., among others, he makes a compelling argument that mental illness is actually an incredibly healthy thing for a leader to have.

    The history of leadership is one of stoicism, suppressing emotion. A leader must be as emotionless, and quick witted as possible when making decisions on a battlefield or else lives will be lost. Dr. Ghaemi makes the argument, however, that the truly great leaders are completely incapable of doing this... so they fake it.

    The fractured, depressed, ranting, ebrasive comments in the journals of many of the worlds greatest leaders, would sound like absolute madness to the people surrounding them, at the time they were written. He in essence, even picks a disease, that he thinks makes the absolutely perfect leader, especially in times of great distress, bi-polar disorder.

    When in the manic phase, people with bipolar disorder are capable of maintaining a steely gaze, an air of confidence, and strength in even the most desperate of situations... Then they go to a room in the dark, sit alone... and destroy themselves... It was a very compelling read.

    “When our world is in tumult, mentally ill leaders function best.” Or: “In the storm of crisis, complete sanity can steer us astray, while some insanity brings us to port.”

    “The best crisis leaders are either mentally ill or mentally abnormal; the worst crisis leaders are mentally healthy.”

    Dr. Ghaemi also goes on to suggest that, for example, in his studies of Tony Blair, and George Bush, he found nowhere near as much regret, shame, empathy, or sadness, as one would expect. Even in private writings and conversations, they still see to think they did okay.
    • thumb
      Aug 14 2012: i knew such a study/book had been written already, i was just simply unaware of it.

      thank-you very much for this post, it is extremely relevant and interesting.
  • thumb
    Aug 13 2012: my definition of emotional intelligence as i knew it is incorrect. i should re-phrase the original post to say that "do leaders experience emotion?"

    EDIT: just changed the original post to say emotions rather than emotional intelligence.
  • thumb
    Aug 13 2012: "Emotional intelligence" is a key trait of anyone, who has been able to navigate the political, structural, and organizational minefields necessary to get done what they want done and rise to a senior position in an organization. The more interesting question to me is against whom do senior leaders exercise their "emotional intelligence" as they rise?

    It may be less necessary to get stakeholder buy-in, see who the influencers are, and change minds within the organization a person leads (e.g. CEOs with manufacturing staff, mid-level management, and process champions) than it is to use this trait interacting with those in other organizations (e.g. CEOs with stock analysts, government regulators, and new media).
  • Aug 13 2012: In order for me to get any traction in this debate I would need a functional definition of Emotional Intelligence. Got one?
    • thumb
      Aug 13 2012: Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_intelligence

      "Emotional intelligence (EI) is the ability to identify, assess, and control the emotions of oneself, of others, and of groups. Various models and definitions have been proposed of which the ability and trait EI models are the most widely accepted in the scientific literature. Ability EI is usually measured using maximum performance tests and has stronger relationships with traditional intelligence, whereas trait EI is usually measured using self-report questionnaires and has stronger relationships with personality. Criticisms have centered on whether the construct is a real intelligence and whether it has incremental validity over IQ and the Big Five personality dimensions."
      • Aug 13 2012: Thank you James. That is quite clear....................John
  • thumb
    Aug 13 2012: What I know and also feel is that leaders need high EQ as finally s/he has to infulence people to get things done.
    Another thing heard being on discussion for leaders is AQ i.e. Adversity Quotient.....
  • thumb
    Aug 13 2012: Dear Griffin,

    My theory is that the characters often portrayed as 'gods' long ago in history were leaders of immense emotional intelligence with far superior levels of empathy to that which we are able to recognize today.

    I feel that you are, at heart, an optimistic entity. I also pray that soon we see the return of one or several of these 'gods' to conjure up some magic for the human species to witness. World peace in the blink of an eye, perhaps?
    • thumb
      Aug 13 2012: With that said, if Morgan Freeman were to run for president, I think he'll get a ton of popular votes just because he has the "voice of God" lol
  • thumb
    Aug 13 2012: Without any data on the issue, I would have thought that those who rise to positions of leadership (as opposed to those who achieve their positions by birthright) tend to have needed emotional intelligence to reach that point.
    • thumb
      Aug 13 2012: Leaders are required to have some quality that allows others to follow them imo. I think, usually this is emotional intelligence or incredibly good communication skills. Other strong beliefs that people believe in is also necessary.
  • thumb
    Aug 13 2012: I've been reading the Steve Jobs biography. I would consider Jobs to have an incredibly high emotional intelligence. People refer to his power/charm as a "Reality Distortion Field". He knows how to get people to do the seemingly impossible to reality due to his charisma. He can also make something seem way more "revolutionary" than it actually is. And he was also a very emotional, artistic guy and knows what to say and how to say it to get people to do what he wants.

    I think EQ can be a very powerful tool to lead people. But it also depends on the context of the circumstances, and the audience.