This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
What would you do for the world with $1 million?
The TED Prize has entered a new chapter, with this year's winner receiving $1 million dollars to execute their one wish to inspire the world.
This has me thinking: what would you do for the world with the $1 million prize? Answer here and you may see yourself on the TED blog soon.
Want to nominate a mentor, colleague, friend or even yourself for the TED Prize? Nominations are open from now until August 31st at this website:
http://www.tedprize.org/














Han Kim
Levi LCL 10+
Riling up the human spirit and an identity of a global citizenry as a real living breathing thing, with both legal and political realities, has far reaching potential to address the problems we face today.
Kaylor Garcia
Imad Atwi 10+
What if this TED plan was their main breakthrough? And they did not have any proven track record to wet the appetite and comfort of TED jury?
Robert Bujnarowski
Simone Choy
Lori Scott
Gerald Gormley
Emma Jones
Of course, Kim kardashian would be along for the ride... Can't completely revolutionise MTV too fast ... And I think it would be pretttttty funny!
Diana Pederson
Wade Crum
Mats Kaarbö 10+
Tanja Nestoroska
Marlon Ventura
Lands End Dmc Baleon
Jeremy Garner
Bryant Alden
Jean-Luc M
Sally Vallongo
The operation would start with total remediation: medical and dental treatments; educational catchup, physical fitness, personal counseling, basic skills for life (what used to be called home economics and shop). That would probably take a year. At the end, through various testing mechanisms, these young people would be steered into training programs to prepare them for the full range of careers and workplace opportunities.
This initiative could well provide our country with a new generation ready and willing to move the U.S. ahead in a more balanced and ecologically-informed manner.
Stephanie White Place
Mary Krause
Robert Carter
Mary Krause
Jeff McEldowney
Elisa Sly 20+
Show them about leadership , innovation,creativity and then do streamings of this in every city.
Education , education , education so human beings see that the world is changing and we must adapt to the new order.
Remember there is a lot of difference between one culture and other . In some places we talk about stem cells and in another about people that have sanitation problems.
Uday Pasricha 100+
Nathan Kessel
Joe Black
Looking at the numbers of people in third world countries one easily realises the need for more money to support more start-ups or humanitarian projects. :)
Looking at the current financial system in probably all western countries you realise that all it takes
to have more money to spread out is creating a real bank using the 1 million as initial reserve.
After founding a real bank you are allowed to create more money out of nothing by giving out loans of up to 10 times more money than used to found it which is called fractional reserve banking.
Giving that we are not aiming for profit like all the other commercial banks and we do not use any money taken from a central bank at any interest rate > 0, we are not forced to charged intrest as we use our own 1 million, so there is nothing that stops us from lending about 10x our money without charging intrest.
I also like the implementation of the suggested 'instead rates', an obligation to grant at least one micro credit themselves under the same conditions to help others when the start-up business reached a stable financial situation.
http://www.positivemoney.org.uk
http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/2012/08/imf-backs-full-reserve-banking/
Sébastien Paris
Even if micro-credit is a proven venture (mainly when given to women, such in Africa), I think it can also be dangerous to always come back to micro-credit as THE solution when it comes to more global approach. Allowme explain my thoughts:
Firstly, credit is prohibited by a lot of cultures-religions such as Muslim, the biggest population on earth. So right there, micro-credit is a discriminative approach.
Secondly, in most of this civilizations the individuals that have access to foreign influence (credit, money, etc) are casts that already have the dominance in their community (and not always in a positive way). Access to money has also proven to create more problems then solutions (think Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.)
Thirdly, but not the least, money (or credit) doesn't do much without knowledge. In the human world we live in, we now know that well intended people are often taken advantage of by more egoist-driven influences with another objective: money.
So I think money is not the forefront tool to all global problems, human knowledge is...
Joe Black
but I believe that many people here assume and know this has to happen
and participate in the exchange of knowledge without thinking much about it...
Micro-credit is seen as an effective solution because it is part of the philosphy to
help people help thenselves. This help always includes some form of knowledge.
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
We know from Prof Herzberg that the motivation to help oneself
(a result of training which created an ability) is not enough,
but people also require the opportunity to act upon their ability (to fish).
Here starts the impact of mirco finance as these loans avoid the trap
of perpetually rising debt by not charging any intrest.
I can imagine that the unfounded accumulation of wealth by creditors led to
the prohibition of conventional credit in some of those cultures/religions
which were/are more future-oriented...