This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
What is the most factual or most fictitious representation of science in a sci-fi/ syfy you have watched?
The line between Science and Fiction is thin, and movie and TV productions make it even more blur. It is hard to distinguish the truth; either it already exists or is being worked on in some lab with fiction; no one is headed in that direction or it has been proven not to work. Share on what you have watched or read and your views on the science or fiction behind it.














David Hamilton 50+
Hong-Min Yoon
Mats Kaarbö 10+
Whitney Njiru 500+
Shane Schuller
Why cant they make decent movies about human aliens, which obviously exist in the galaxy. And leave out violent war scenes. I don't think every race in the galaxy wishes to kill earth race.
Whitney Njiru 500+
george lockwood 20+
george lockwood 20+
Whitney Njiru 500+
Barry Palmer 50+
Love the books of Robert A Heinlein. Within the boundaries of the known science of his day, almost everything he wrote was plausible and very well researched.
Whitney Njiru 500+
Gabo Moreno 100+
(Now I noticed that the question was not about the most absurd, but about the very best things. Sorry.)
Whitney Njiru 500+
Gabo Moreno 100+
I do think we will be able to disrupt rendering by "physical" contact. It's kind of already on the works, with a bit of success (a derivative is the electronic game-players that respond to your movements).
James Zhang 30+
the graphic novel, not movie adaptation.
Watchmen delved more deeply on the social effects of the existence of superheroes and sci-fi concepts than the actual technicalities. Still one of my favorite stories, ALL the characters were done hella well.
Whitney Njiru 500+
James Zhang 30+
douglas macrae smith
1)downloading the human pysche as a sort of immortality where one may access a sort of virtual afterlife, or reboot into a new body in case of lethal accidents
2)benevolent rule by 'Minds': a type of sentient AI
3)'Genofixing' of humans in order to benefit from extra drug glands, different skin colors etc
4)post scarcity due to ability to create whatever matter desired directly from energy
5)neural lace: a sort of www or telepathic connection with anyone or everyone at anytime
All this leading to a highly succesful and hedonistic, but ultimately blase society, life having no more real challenges
Whitney Njiru 500+
no. 1 sounds interesting but we are far from it seeing as we still do not know much about the brain and how it fully functions. I think we cant adequately capture and store our memories leave a lone our thought processes and ego- the balance between id and super-ego- that defines who we are.
no. 2 AI needs to be understood from all the 8 generally accepted intellegence branches. check my previous question at http://www.ted.com/conversations/564/is_artificial_intelligence_rea.html
I will think more on 3 and 4 then get back to you.
no 5 seems possible but still a long way off. some R&D working on wifi for cars to prevent pedestrians getting hit, we have bluetooth on clothes soon wifi and there is some contact lens that acts like a computer interface. http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/01/27/contact-lenses-transmit-computer-images-and-data-directly-into-the-eyes/
I think sy-fy/sci-fi inspires developers to attempt some of the stuff.
Lawren Jones 10+
Whitney Njiru 500+