This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Science leads to death.
Objective science is not able to penetrate into the domain called life because it denies the validity of the subjective domain which contains the essential elements of life. Life is defined by the presence of conscious feeling in a body. Denying subjective feelings leads to numbness. When numbness has become total one is a corps, dead!
Scientific knowledge is objective knowledge and is only applicable to machine technology. It has nothing to offer in the quest for more life other than to kill it while make it more machine like claiming it to be life.
Humans have become convinced that they are human resources, a commodity at the service of capital. People now speak of their bodies in terms of being fantastic machines. Disease is no longer dis-ease or dis-comfort it is a diagnostic description used to amplify a patience's fear and dependence so as to lock in more income for the practitioner. Robotics and medical prosthesis' are actually blending sentient beings with machines. These humans are not victims. The self hatred of subjective denial has created their situations of need and the objectivity of the machine is there to serve.
Cultures with the most science have become the most insensitive to feeling because of the objective paradigms they hold. Thus they have killed, injured, maimed and tortured more people than one can imagine through declared and undeclared warfare with in the last hundred years. Millions upon millions. They now use drone machines to do their killing and intimidation and some how think it is not them pulling the trigger.
This is the result of humans following a consciously designed path of scientific objectivity which by its very nature is intended to desensitize and annihilate the subjective aspect of human consciousness. .
The followers of scientific objectivity are doomed to die from it as they drive feeling from the body. Steven Hawkins is a prime example of scientific objectivity carried to an extreme. Machines keep him alive.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.
Salim Solaiman 50+
Does this idea means One Will Be Immortal if s/he Leaves Science?
Interesting thing with SCIENCE is that it doesn't bother, when someone denounces it after taking all the advantages from IT.....
John Allyn
Each individual is the subject of their own existence sounder by an objective reality. If the subject is being absolutely introspectively absorbed it dies of starvation. If the subject denies subjectivity and is absolutely absorbed in objectivity it dies of numbness. One of my primary paradigms is that life at its fullest will be found at the interface between these two domains where each blends with the other in what I speculate might be called sensual intellectualism. The senses guide the intellect inspires.
Thanks for your ideas and statements.....................John
Salim Solaiman 50+
Well what does it mean ....
to a fish
to a bird
to a deer
to a tree
to a plankton
to a bacteria
and so on
All are dead ?
John Allyn
In order to go on one must accept that the physical proceeds from the metaphysical. The Big Bang is the scientist's term for the emergence of the physical out of the metaphysical. I call it Original Cause, What took place in that moment we are still attempting to resolve through understanding. I am suggesting that with out integrating the objective point of view with the subjective point of view we are stuck with reoccurring death and birth.
The metaphysical has an overview which can supply information to the physical concerning pain and death, if we are willing to listen. The metaphysical can only be accessed through the individual who practices subjective introspection (an aspect being meditation). Because science dismisses the metaphysical out of hand, we must accept that it can lead is to the door into the metaphysical, but we in our subjectivity are the only ones who can open it.
The self importance held with in our egos wishes to avoid such a possibility because one sense that this self importance must die in order for one to open the door into the metaphysical. This dilemma of all of nature being stuck in the pain/death cycle can only be solved by the human aspect of nature. The self importance we are attempting to maintain out of the illusion it is us, is what I call The God Problem. The self importance is playing God.
Salim Solaiman 50+
What is your answer then to my question in the post above ?
John Allyn
Salim Solaiman 50+
Moreover it is clearly evident that because of scientific development the life expectancy of human being has increased in most of the countries. Child mortality has gone down. So your main premise is not a valid one.
John Allyn
From my understanding human population is expanding not because of more spirits being present but because denial has caused the original spirits to fragment into what looks like a human but which only has the form but not all of the pieces.
Two people fucking, and by that I mean two people moving sexual rage between them selves may fragment there combined denied rage into a conception which the woman gives birth to. This I would call a rage fragment. These come back to haunt us in the form of domestic violence, mass killings (Norway, Colorado) and sociopath behavior which ends up doing jail time.
Recently a man killed some Jewish kids at a Jewish school and it got a lot of press. When the police corned him he yelled something to the effect of, "kill me, I wish to die as much as you wish to live". This is self hatred incarnate. It walks talks and breaths. How much conscious feeling is there in that life form. How much consciousness. At least enough to seek death.
Our fragmentation into more population has eliminated great numbers and many kinds of life forms as we kill them and over run their habitat. Do this increase in human population of depressed internalize rage fragments living lonely lives in city apartments or mad men on the prowl qualify as more life. Does it have more life than the animal, fish, tree, and microorganism population which they displace or use as resources to keep their bodies alive. That is a subjective value judgment for each persons tp make.
I am not here to judge your values or level of understanding. I am attempting to understand the thinking and values of the humans around me while offering a different point of view.
That may have value for you or not, I am getting what I need for my process.