- Kevin Jacobson
- Richland Center, WI
- United States
This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
The U.S. Really Needs to Recycle it's Radioactive Waste. Here's Why.
The U.S. is going to go Thorium withing the next couple of decades. What I mean is that we are going to start using commercial LFTR instead of modern Uranium/Plutonium reactors. But, before we get there, the U.S. NEEDS to recycle it's radioactive waste. You hear scientists complain about how modern nuclear reactors are consuming more Uranium at an exponential rate which is a horrible thing since Uranium is only around a quarter as common as Thorium. Well you know what I say about it. DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! Recycle radioactive waste! Going Thorium is definitely doing something about it, but LFTR's won't be a main power source for a decade or more. If radioactive waste was recycled, so much fuel would be saved. I believe that this would reduce the the stress on the remaining Uranium supplies and would reduce the amount of waste dumped in waste sites. If you took the tons of waste from all the dumping sites and reactor pools, just imagine how much fuel would come out of that. I know you would have to build reprocessing facilities, but it would be well worth it. What do you think?
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.













Efrain Torres
The ionization and acceleration process on He3 looks more efficient and we can find He3 in the moon which makes the reaction proliferation resistant by controlling the He3 supply.
I do not make the calculations. If you do please let me know.
Kevin Jacobson
Efrain Torres
A good simulator software will be great for this process.
Kevin Jacobson