# TED Conversations

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

## Can we ever look as something without judgement?

I am attempting to challenge a notion we all have engrained into our Head and that is time.
I developed an equation that can calculate time with longitude only and some other variables but simple. When I try to get them in-front of anyone they quickly dismiss it.

I ask you can we ever look at something without judgement?

I know I want to but I know I judge everything no matter what...

Oh if you interested in the equation of time I have a video where I run through 10 problems using simple basic arithmetic. you can amaze friends at the least.

But i have never been called, dismiss and talk too so rudely in my life; while their delivery was polite. Literally as soon as I say I have a more accurate equation for time people actually change their tone and speak to me as I am a child with little understanding.

0
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

• #### natasha nikulina50+

• 0
Jul 15 2012: HI,Joshua !
Maybe your equation is the most literal answer to the everyday trivial question: What is going on Here Now ? Let me describe the ' picture ' I came up with, after watching your videos, not once :)
Time is not an operator ',Now ' is a snap shot, time stops at here,but 'here' is not a dot it's 2 D line which goes through the center. Events/data are placed along the line and are viewed not in their time/ change development in isolation or in course-effect connection to other events/data through sequence, but being frozen in ALL connections. In this picture the center is everywhere. It's not reality it's a map, that can be used. The line moves to the next Now and we can see the result of the change which took time to occur, but what is important we see the change everywhere in all 'events' all over the line in the most harmonious way with no dissonance.

What do you think ? Does it have anything in common with your equation ? If not , please be sensitive to my attempt and find the time to show me where's the flaw in my picture. I really try to understand, I don't know why, but I think it's important.

Thank you very much !
• #### Joshua Sisk

• 0
Jul 15 2012: I am going to read your post a few times to make sure I see what you are seeing...

Before that let explain that time is the expression of two different points and the distance associated. The experience of time happens at one point "The NOW".

The NOW is the determinate of the beliefs that we create. These beliefs are using multiple NOWs to justify the idea.

The issues we have with now is we are never at 100% accuracy and we blur data and store it as 100% accurate..

So if you think of someone with glasses who forgot their glasses and witness a murder then called upon to be a witness and they stated This is the ultimate truth but no-one asked if they had their glasses on.

Just like that situation our brain accepts all input as accurate but between the input and the chemicals the brain releases that affect the sense....

The issue with this concept is it can answer everything if the appropriate people would just look at it with fresh eyes, sadly the concept would place most of these individuals out of a research job....

So from the answer we want to unlock in the universe all the way down to the what happens in our brain which as I keep diving into the problem make the human mind nothing more than a processing unit of past experiences.

I will do another video explaining the now.... will be posted by Tuesday night...
• #### natasha nikulina50+

• 0
Jul 15 2012: OK, so we can find understanding here, I guess. I've just posted in another conversation, that what we think we 'know' is our coherent belief system. The left cerebral hemisphere of our brain is largely responsible for creating a belief system to maintain the sense of understanding, the new input is processed through the pre existed belief system, if it doesn't fit it is denied and and 'mind' continues to collect data that fit or be more precise it makes them such. Taking into the consideration that there is no such thing as uninterpreted fact, it's not that difficult:) The amount of data ( the quantitative value ) serves as a proof that the vision is correct, but it is not
"The issues we have with now is we are never at 100% accuracy and we blur data and store it as 100% accurate.."

But right hemisphere , the intuitive mind is constantly challenging the status quo and cognitive dissonance force us to review our belief system. Correct me if i am wrong , you suggest that we can see things through 'intuitve' mind ' without the left brain belief system storage, hence see "with fresh eyes".
It reminds me " Except you become as little children you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven "

Correct me if I am wrong , you think that it is possible to make external internally perceivable without attachment to the belief system. To get rid of the illusion of the division of the world 'out there' and 'in here". Is it your pursuit ?

Thanks !
• #### Joshua Sisk

• 0
Jul 15 2012: Dead on you have the concept down pat... What current studies state is http://www.ted.com/talks/annie_murphy_paul_what_we_learn_before_we_re_born.html

My pursuit is nothing more getting this information out to who ever needs it.

We know that inaccurate is perceived as truths cause people to act the way they do and need to gain the experiences needed to change belief. Basically locking up someone for an action against the law (Breaking the Law) will do nothing positive.

The Basic math about time and the proposed notion that space through our eyes inaccurate, will lead us to an accurate 3d virtual representation that we can re-graph in different ways to pull correlations from. The math and concept states that Einstein was inaccurate but close.

In today's day and age no respectable physics person wants to admit that they never thought to challenge Timespace theory with simple math. Additionally that time and space is restricted by light.

NOW when we look at the now and how we decide what to perceive data points back to existing data brought into our brain why do we have these choices or the idea of choices.

When Look at this it seems that our brains are doing nothing more than comparing intensity of the ideas and emotion attached to the data that forms our beliefs.

My pursuit is to get people to accept that there is not a mystical reason why we do what we do or predetermined chain of events driving everybody but the choice and option are ours.

We can choose to see and control our world what is in it and what will not be in it solely by accepting what our eyes(senses) has stored inaccurately or view our perfect future in our mind and attach happiness and powerful emotions that will change beliefs of the world because I hold this to be true always testing the accuracy with others to gain the best perspective. We hold the key and it is our for the living...

I will do an updated video still but Plus submitted to kick starter for a book publishing...

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.