TED Conversations

Derek Young

Thinker and Experimenter,

TEDCRED 30+

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

If someone you knew was a pathological truth-teller; how would you react to this person?

Most of you have probably hear the term "pathological liar", meaning they lie all the time, from dusk til dawn. We all lie though, but too much lies can ruin any relationship. If there was no lies, but pure truth 24/7 360days a year for the rest of that persons' life, how would you react to this person?

Some have argued with me that we need lies to live for example, 'your best friends mother on her death bed asks you where her son is, and you couldn't tell her that her son has just died on an air plane that blew up just before landing, so you lie and tell her that his flight was cancelled and he says he loves you very much and you fill in the blanks with fond memories....now let's change that situation a bit....

Your best friend mother on her death bed asks for her son, but you know he just died on that exploding plane, so you give her the low down and tell her that his flight didn't make it here because his plane blew up, though he really loves you and he told me this before we got off the phone.

Two scenarios, both end the same, she passes away, but the details may be different depending on the individual.

A pathological truth-teller doesn't blurt things out though, like if they see something/someone they hate, they won't go I hate that thing over there and then proceed to tell the thing or person they hate it/them, though if they were asked to give an opinion they would tell the truth.

If you asked this person a question, they would answer you extremely truthfully and at times it might even seem offensive. For instance, you ask them "do I look good in this" and the pathological truth-teller says "it looks hideous on you, but you already tried all the clothes in this store and they all don't look good on you, so let's go to a store with a different style?".

How would you react to this person?

Update: This is a scenario of a world with pathological truth tellers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-H2dNfx-Uw

+1
Share:

Closing Statement from Derek Young

All I could think of is "thank you for participating and hope the remnance of this discussion will shed light upon your life", though this topic is far from reaching any type of consensus; we can all strive to respect one another and live earnestly and honestly.

May you take positive leaps and bounds in your life.

progress indicator
  • thumb
    Jul 23 2012: The only "pathological" truth tellers that I am aware of are autistic folk who on some level are said to really be unaware that there is an "other". This would extend to those with Aspergers in some cases but take note that Aspergers as a diagnosis is set to disappear with the DSM 5 manual- it will become just high functioning autism.
  • thumb
    Jul 21 2012: IN MY VIEW:
    Too much of anything is bad. I would also feel sorry for a such a person as the one seems to be trapped in a prison created by nature itself
  • thumb
    Jul 6 2012: Interesting subject....just reminded me about Jim Carrey in the film Liar Liar....
    • thumb
      Jul 13 2012: Oh yea! He blurts out all his opinions though, so maybe not the truth, but my real question would probably be "If someone you knew was a pathologically honest person; how would you react to this person?".
      • thumb
        Jul 14 2012: Honestly that will be pretty uncomfortable and also difficult situation for me.........as

        S/he will be talking about anything good if I have which I will not be comfortable with....also very openly s/he will be talking about all my downsides....which will really be difficult to withstand for me being an average person........

        We are comfortable with "MASK".....that's my opinion that anyone can disagree
  • thumb
    Jul 6 2012: Great Question.
    It would seem a "truth blurter" would be one of those people that in whatever situation they say exactly whatever is on their mind regardless of the outcome. If one was listening to this person, would 100% of what they were "blurting" out be truth? Truth and opinions are two different things.

    "Do I look good in this" is subjective. You could look amazing in something and ask the pathological truth teller and because they have to pee real bad or have something in their contact, they say whatever you want to hear. For that moment, that is their truth.

    Sitting in counseling with someone that you trust and you might have been working on an issue that until this moment has alluded you. Today is the day that you hear the truth. Today is the day you put all the puzzle pieces together and are able to hear it.

    Kids/babies are the only pathological truth tellers, that is until someone has told them to see the world differently. When a baby cries when it is being held by a stranger and stops crying when held by its mother, that is truth. We lose that ability and are told its rude.

    Religions have their truths. They may not be the truths of everyone.
    Truth of Evolution vs Creationism.

    As we get older our truths become more opinions rather than truth.
  • Jul 4 2012: This would be a great person to be around because if I want his honest opinion he'll give it,
    if i don't want his opinion I won't ask him and i'll believe what I want.
    • thumb
      Jul 6 2012: Truth and opinion, same thing?
      • thumb
        Jul 13 2012: I don't think truth and opinion are the same thing sarah, but after this whole discussion I have come to my own conclusion that truth is something perceivable or "just is" like the truth of the matter is I had a hair cut, but others honest opinions differ from person to person.

        Hope that made sense sarah. =)
  • thumb
    Jul 4 2012: Hi Debra!

    I wasn't sure where to respond to your comment, so I will start this comment for your comments already made in the conversation, recently that is. =P

    I found that many others in this conversation have used the term "truth" loosely as I did and I believe I should replace my use of truth with honest/y/ies, though truth seems to fall in place for my topic somehow, so I am not certain that I found a consensus in my judgement for what is "truth" and a "pathological truth teller". May I have some assisstance from you to bring my mind to a consensus?

    Truth is, as James says, is something that exists; a pathological truth teller is more of a constantly honest person?

    I am discovering new things about me as this conversation unfolds, so please bare with me on this journey into my mind. =P
    • thumb
      Jul 4 2012: HI Back to you! Good morning!
      I too am being wonderfully challenged to think and re-examine my thoughts. I love some of your theoretical work and would add that I had such strict parents that a directive to tell the truth meant -tell everything you know including the colour of your underwear. It took me sometime to realize that my thoughts belong to me and that I choose when and where to share them.
      Part of what you seem to be discussing is perseveration which is common in prefrontal head injury.In Some cases people simply speak before their brain is in gear and comment relentlessly on whatever they observe. Quiet is an anathma to these fearful people.
  • Jul 2 2012: This isn't really a hypothetical situation. Ask any 5 year old a question, and you will get an honest answer.Be careful what you ask. You may not be ready to hear the truth.
    • thumb
      Jul 2 2012: Haha, they say that children are imprints of their environment, without any filters for their information. Interesting concept though, so we were all pathological truth tellers in one points of our lives, but according to Pamela Meyer:How to spot a liar, says that we were all out-right liars at one points in our lives also, so truth and lies for a child might be similar in some ways? I'm just trying make sense of something, but not sure where I'm going....just a random thought.
      • thumb
        Jul 3 2012: Hey Derek, With all due respect to Pamela, and even Dan Ariely in his new book, I am not convinced that we were all liars at one point in time. Some of your theories resonate with me. Harsh parenting can create 'truth tellers' just as it can create 'patholgical liars' - I think it depends on personality type and resiliancy- the less resiliant might choose truth when they are broken as a form of keeping clairty in their world view. This early breaking of the heart though, might be ultimately redeemed as a preferred life style which enables bonding, self reflection and even self-sacrifice.
      • thumb
        Jul 3 2012: Myfanwy- I hope you find this as you had no reply button and thus no notification that I was responding to your question. And it is a good question. Rememnber that even though i have an MA in Social Personality Psych - these are just my own ideas off the top of my head.
        If a person is committed to a life of truth telling, self-sacrifice -in geater and lessor ways is part of it. IN order to tell the truth all the time one must be prepared to face the music in life, or the firing squad in corporations or be prepared for the poop to hit the fan. Corporations in my opinion are allergic to truth at the customer centric level. At the top they espouse it but like harsh parents, they often make lying far more rewarded and punish truth that they do not enjoy. If they blew it on a major account or city by denying the customer what they need by refusing to ship it into the country when the accounnt uses tons of a product and few others do, this is a defensible corporate position but they have to then realize that this loss of account was by their own choice and own up; Telling or reminding them of the truth is then quite unpopular. If you tell your friend about her huzbands affair you have to be prepared for the fall out (I sure would have appreciated a heads up and not shot the mesager but many others do shoot the messanger..
    • thumb
      Jul 4 2012: Myfanwy, Self sacrifice for famiily members is de rigeur and most people of my aquaintance can managei to do it= I think of it as simply suirrendering ones self interest to a higher goodor higher level of self interest.
      Your point in your final paragraph is excellent. I call being successful at that being our 'best selves". If not for our loved ones. for whom would we do it? I love how charitable your final anlysis is. Yes, people get swamped and try to 'cope" which produces even more rubbish in the world. I like the way you framed that - it expands my way of thinkning. Thanks for that. Improper use of power is a perfect example, to my mind and at one time or other most people have done so..
    • thumb
      Jul 6 2012: Great dialogue.
      We all self sacrifice in one way or another. Big or small, it happens.
      If one looks in the mirror everyday and really looks, it is hard not to want to be the best that you can be regardless of who is around.
  • Jul 1 2012: Sorry Derek but you're conflating opinion, perception and belief with fact (truth). Fact is fact. Perceptions of a fact however are bound to be different from one person to the next because they all discover components of a fact in their own time and in differing orders and tones--that does not change the facts i.e. truth of the matter. This issue of "truth" being a matter of finite facts is probably the most important building block of civilization. There is no "separate truth" for each person--there are only separate perceptions, separate beliefs, separate impressions, separate experiences. We don't go into a court room and explain our systems of truth so that the facts then justify themselves according to our separate truths. When people agree to this single tenet that truth is separate from experience, there is hope for peace and order--be it on an individual or mass social level. But if people think that their perception makes something a fact, we are backward and bound to stay that way. Take a look around the world at societies in which belief trumps truth.
    • thumb
      Jul 2 2012: Okay James,

      Currently right now, you say that that truths are seperate from fact, and I'm thinking "how is he so confident that what he is currently elaborating is a fact and/or truth?", so the relevance to fact and/or truth is relevant to who you speak to.

      For instance, Pluto was considered our ninth planet, but then astronomers found that it wasn't because it is actually more closely related to the Kaiper belt objects, though some still stick to their belief that Pluto is still a planet. The astronomers strived to find a universal definition for what a planet is, but I believe there is no solid consensus currently, so "what is fact" and "what is truth" in this situation; it seems different depending on the individual.

      Though, we can both agree that we have similarities that unite us, but we are still different enough to see different meanings in a similar topic; fascinating how that happens. All of this is my personal perception through my experiences.

      Thanks for reading my thoughts. =)
      • Jul 3 2012: FYI I said the opposite: facts and truth are one in the same. The example of Pluto being a planet and then deemed not one has nothing to do with the logic of truth or fact. The only truth or fact that we know about Pluto is that it exists as a sphere in orbit around the sun. It does not know humans call it Pluto nor can it care how we ledger it in our books or perceptions.

        It's critically important in the course of a human life time to get to a place where you understand that there's a difference between existence and perception. Two centuries ago only 6 planets were known to exist. That doesn't mean the rest didn't exist--it means we didn't have the technology or reason yet to detect them. There are still plenty of things on our own planet, out in space or even in our own minds that we don't understand everything about and may never, but they continue on their merry courses regardless of who discovers or ignores them and what they call them. Perception is not reality--and if we fail to sort that out, we are "inside a box" where we can be manipulated by those who will tell you anything to get you to side with them.
        • thumb
          Jul 4 2012: Ah, so the existence of things are the evident truths, and the labels, philisophical discussions, and things generally humanly fabricated are more so on the "perceptions" side of the field?
        • thumb
          Jul 4 2012: Could you please define, in your own words to the best of your knowledge, truths/facts as well as perceptions, with some type of universal example for each or at least several common examples?
      • Jul 4 2012: I'd like to and actually have tried but have run out of characters and decided to bail. You can certainly educate yourself on what the word perception means. Truth and facts should be pretty obvious but things like say, what color something is, can be a bit subjective if one is color blind or there is some difference in how our eyes react to light. Two cars crashing into each other is THE important truth or fact. The shade of tan or maroon doesn't change that there was a collision. If you study philosophy you will find a lot of minute hair-splitting because words can have differing effects. Some people will assume that someone who was judged terminally ill who recovered to have received a "miracle" because their recovery defies the odds, but it is a truth that the laws of physics were not suspended for a divine intervention--surely the devices which constantly monitor a human being in intensive care would reveal evidence of super-natural disruption. The truth is, the person got well and why is simply a scientific problem to be solved. We can't assume that "prayer" influenced a god to intercede, but it is theoretically possible that this person being the subject of so much hope and good will may have been influenced by a force of human nature we don't yet understand. All we can say is that the patient beat the odds and unexpectedly recovered.
    • thumb
      Jul 3 2012: yes! to James!. How often have i heard that there are many truths? To which I reply BUNK! Even in that proverbial car accident- only one set of events actually happened and if a corner store had a video camera at the right angle that is quickly apparent. There can, however, be multiple interpretations due to imperfect knowlege or perspective
  • thumb
    Jul 1 2012: I think the point here is not to find whether the truth is universal or different among the people but to talk about how we react to the people who tells the truth(opposite word to lie in this context) even though the situation is not appropriate for the truth. In my case, If I meet the person who pathologically lie without caring other people's feeling or being aware of the atmosphere in the situation where the person belong, I will think about what makes him or her behave that way. Maybe it might be due to the dysfunction in some part of the brain if the word "pathological" is concerned, but repeating in telling the truth does not neccessarily mean it is "pathological". I am not sure if the question here concens about only the pathological truth teller, but if not, I think I will try to understand that person as much as I can rather than reacting passively to what he or she behaved. In other words, I will focus on his or her bahavior rather than focusing on mine.
    • thumb
      Jul 1 2012: That is the ultimate form of empathy. I think we could learn a lot and help many people if we try understand the other persons behaviours and personality. Thank you for your thoughts JaeHun! =)
    • thumb
      Jul 3 2012: JaeHun, Thank you for this comment. I agree. Did you know that damage to the front of your head ([pefrontal lobes where thought and emotion are integrated) might be involved with lying?
  • Jun 30 2012: Probably nothing, but if they got really annoying or I found their truth telling to be hurtful, I'd lay down a paradox on them or something and watch their head explode.
  • Jun 30 2012: Unless that person was a mind reader, just laugh
  • thumb
    Jun 30 2012: Who knowse the truth ? What can be true for me, it not necessarely the truth for someone else !

    For the purpose of this discussion, I will start by saying : Ouff, a bit rough to be a "pathalogical truth teller or a pathalogical-liar".

    I believe in telling the truth all the way, so you don't have to remember, what you told this person last time, and keep the lie going on, you can become mentally ill...to much to process, unhealthy etc.

    It's all depends on how you tell the truth. If this pathalogical truth teller you talking about, is more of a person that consciously hurt other people feelings, for his or her own purpose of feeling better about his or herself, who need these people...they can eat grass, as far that I know!

    On the other hand, if you are telling me truth to help me grow, change for the best of whom I can become, I can deal with it better...furthermore, this pathalogical truth teller, has to be able, to listen the truth about him or herself to, it as to be a two ways streets. I you want to tell ME my truths, you better be able to ear YOUR truths from me! It's a give and take situation here!!

    At the end, it's all about a good dosage in everything, and also, if you can send it, you better be able to receive it!!
    • Jun 30 2012: Sorry but the truth does not change from person to person Only perception changes. People of faith often make the argument of truth being different from one person to the next. They must catch themselves and distinguish between finite, knowable, practical truth of verifiable reality and "ultimate truths" which address unknowable origins. Truth is what law and science exist on and thus what makes civilization possible. Belief in super-nature does not make it a truth. If even one miracle were true, it is likely society would not have advanced at all because everyone would be held in place by belief and superstitions in which there would be more worry about offending the miracle granter than rolling up one's sleeves and engineering solutions to problems.
      • thumb
        Jun 30 2012: You don't have to be sorry James!! That's your point of view and it's the truth for you, but I'll stick to mine!

        Cheers!!
      • thumb
        Jul 1 2012: I don't know James, truth can differ from person to person through life experiences.

        For example, one person might think the truth that vanilla ice cream is the best flavor in the world to ever be invented, then another person comes by and yells that strawberry ice cream is the best flavor in the world. Another scenario has already been played out, like the holocaust. One group of individual believe the truth that their race was superior and they were mandated by a higher calling to wipe the earth of other races; I personally don't believe that is the truth, do you?
        • thumb
          Jul 3 2012: I think this needs more considertion, Derek. You have gone back to colloquial uses of the word truth. Perhaps you need to define "truth for us and for yourself. For me it means the actual events of the situation which indicates that perspective is something different. The problem with your explanation is that there is no verfiiable fact regarding the "truth" of the taste of icecream. It is simply a sensory experience that is sifted through a unique set of tastebuds and through a unique brain to reach a conclusion Not a truth.
  • thumb
    Jun 30 2012: If I was to meet someone that always tell the truth I think I would buy them lunch and study them. At least ask them a lot of questions. As I move about business and social circles I want to be as truthful as possible, But the holdup is not the concept of dishonesty in lying. It is the tactfulness in truth. Truth can be brazen but it can also be tactful. I think a lot of us need to learn the skill of being tactful. I will often use the example of Will Smith. He has a jovial easy going attitude that comes across as truth telling but with a caring attitude. Think of him in MIB when he has to comment on the car or something.... its funny, appears to be his honest feelings, but said in a way that fits his personality and comes across more tactful than brazenly stating the car is terrible. So if my wife asks "how does this look?" Do I answer with brutal and mean honesty "That looks like ugly" or do we ( I mean me) learn to be truthful but tactful in a way that blends well with our personality ...."hmm. I do not think it suits you. It seems to be designed for a different type of woman"

    So If i met that truthful person..... I would like to ask them how they do socially, in business, with loved one or children. What methods do they use to tell the truth and incorporate tact. How do they demur a question. or do they consider that in itself lying. etc
    • thumb
      Jun 30 2012: I like your comment Leo,

      But the only problem (which is normally reoccurring) is that everyone usually assumes that the scenario in the clothes store is a girl, but I challenge the idea to say it is a guy. =P

      I often ask other people, usually, if what I wear looks decent. Just my honesty. =)
      • thumb
        Jul 1 2012: I can live with that. I usually do the same when I ask my wife about what I am wearing.
    • thumb
      Jul 3 2012: If you want your wife to be putty in your hands - a man learns quickly to tell her what he likes on her. It is pretty simple in most cases. IF asked tell her- she will do cartwheels to look good to you. Last weekend i had a date and it was an important occasion for him. I wanted to look appropriate so I laid out four outfits and asked him to choose his preference and he put together a fifth that turned out to be perfect (who knew he would have such a sense of it or care enough to do so?) I felt beautiful all night, and the outfit was perfect for the occassion - fairly reserved, quote feminine and comfy.
  • Jun 30 2012: The fatal error here is

    Pathologies are conditions of the Egoic mind.

    One who could tell nothing but "Truth" would have to have a completely tamed ego ...in which case the "reaction" would be to give recognition to that person being as an "Attained BEing"........Eckhard Tolle is currently the most accessible example.
    • thumb
      Jun 30 2012: Ah, thank you for that insight Ed.

      Could you elaborate a bit more about attained being, egoic mind, and Eckhard Tolle?

      Also, someone in this conversation that said something about truth being relative to the individual and the better term may be honesty. Possibly that indvidual tells nothing but their honest answer, as far as their knowledge can stretch?
      • Jul 3 2012: Derek

        yes this approach to truth applies in the Dualistic realm .

        those that tell/do what appears to be a "non-truth" to others....are doing what They think is best for them ( iow best for their ego/personality) ...therefore it is a "relative truth" to them.

        conforming to your ./ others pointer

        .."Possibly that indvidual tells nothing but their honest answer, as far as their knowledge can stretch? "
  • Jun 30 2012: I think people tend to calibrate their reactions to individuals, as they get to know them.

    For example: A blunt statement will be perceived differently depending on whether its delivered by a typically tactful person, or a typically blunt person.

    For me, the topic question doesn't seem hypothetical. For the past 27 years, I've known a person who I believe fits your description of "Pathological truth teller".

    She wouldn't have told the woman her son was dead, but she typically made a terrible first impression on new people she met.

    The first time I met her, I thought she was very rude. But, people who had known her for a long time seemed completely comfortable around her, and unphased by her apparent rudeness.

    As I got to know her, I too became very comfortable around her. She wasn't malicious. She didn't have hidden agendas. You didn't have to watch your back around her. You always knew where you stood. She was very trustworthy. She loved her family and we loved her.
    • thumb
      Jun 30 2012: So, she is the type of person that would tell you "I don't think I like you very much after that specific comment you just made", or she makes comments like that after you ask her "where do I stand on your list of likeability?"?

      There was an insightful comment made that I would like to note made by Steve C (below).

      "It only becomes pathological when they believe that the facts are more important than me."

      So, your friend probably takes some consideration of your feelings, but is generally really blunt?
      • Jul 1 2012: I don't think feelings were much of a consideration, not because she didn't care about people, or because she believed the truth was more important than the person. Feelings weren't much of a consideration because I don't think she understood feelings very well; even her own.

        Regarding your first paragraph, she wouldn't have made the first comment and I would never have had reason to ask the second.
        • thumb
          Jul 2 2012: Her personality sounds like it is an aquired taste, but I am interested in meeting this person, or someone similar, someday.

          Thanks for the clarification John. =)
  • Jun 30 2012: Since this is a strictly hypothetical question with a very broad range of possible scenarios, I don't think there is any absolute answer. Also, I think any answers to this question would be situation-specific. For example, the variability of "truth" may have a very large range when the truth-teller is asked for, say, an opinion. How can you possibly measure "truth" here?
    • thumb
      Jun 30 2012: Very True Myra,

      I definitely agree with your comment.

      In addition, I would llike to add that, being prepared for the unknown is the best way for preventing something bad from happening. Sometimes discussing something hypothetical, but still realistic, will prepare you for the worst. It is like saying that "hypothetical disasters aren't important to prepare for", but if disaster hits, then preparing for it will help most, unless you make really great split second choices.
  • Jun 29 2012: This reminds me of a "Would you rather" question - would you rather be able to be invisible or be able to read people's minds?
    Could I "handle the truth" from reading people's minds? As a teenager, I don't think I could, but I'd value the total honesty from being able to do so if I could now.
    • thumb
      Jun 29 2012: Sometimes, the most childish and elementary questions are the most pure, potent, and impactful. I grew up with parents that said I questioned too much, and other adults during my academic years also told me I asked too many questions. Now I still ask too many questions regardless what some people say, though I ask it at a more timely manner now. =)
    • thumb
      Jun 29 2012: I have learned from one of my high school teachers that all you need is to ask the right questions, and in my english class in college I learned how to ask these hard questions. =)
      • Jun 29 2012: I bet you'd be a great Socratic Dialogue type of teacher, Derek.
        • thumb
          Jun 29 2012: Ah, shucks. Never had anyone told me that before. Thanks Jim! =)
  • Jun 29 2012: In today's world, particularly western society (but it is spreading in other kinds of cultures if it wasn't there already),
    I believe very strongly that too many people worship lies. First they were taught untruths, so that hearing the truth upsets them. If one were raised with the truth, my feeling or sense of it is that they would welcome it, deal with it and be grateful for it.

    And it is very subtle. So much so that most cannot recognize it and resist seeing it. I have a friend who is owed a lot of money for work they did but the person who owes them has suddenly told them their work is no good and so, viola, a reason not to pay them. What they have done is worked out a deal to get only one sixth of what they are owed, by doing even more work, which adds up to working for nothing. When I told them what to do to get their money, they resisted, saying that if they did that, they wouldn't get any money and that would be the truth. But not getting paid is the lie and it is the lie they are settling for and accepting as the truth, when it is anything but.

    As things continue the way they are going, the only power and weapon the average citizen will have is the truth and it is very powerful but it has to be awakened, put into action and trusted. It is being buried too quickly and as one might imagine, you cannot cover up the truth with truths, you can only cover it up with lies.
    • thumb
      Jun 29 2012: Hi again Random,

      It is very true! People accept non-truths/dishonesty as their reality and it becomes their own personal lie.

      I have seen too many times when people lie to themselves that they don't deserve better or that they don't have a better choice, and we all know there are usually more than one choice in any given situation. Some choices are obscure and some choices are the choices less taken, but are still these choices are there for a reason.

      I wonder if there is such a term as a pathological self-liar?
  • thumb
    Jun 29 2012: I love people who tell the truth. And being honest does not mean a person has to say everything they think. I find that most people are honest but fail to think things through.
  • Jun 29 2012: Maybe the ones that have lost trust in others had abusive parents and the child had to lie to protect itself from mom and dad. When a child cannot trust their caregivers that pretty much sets up a child to be mistrustful.

    And you are right that if said person has a personal history of lying they are more likely to suspect the same in other people. Yes, it would take some special effort for that person to begin healing. A good therapist is invaluable and can point out the errors in a persons critical thinking skills. A highly skilled therapist. I do find though that most people only tell the truth when it does not hurt them. If lying is expedient, most (not all) people will indulge. That is why any business deal must be on paper.

    Hey, oddly enough I listened to a podcast on lying on How Stuff Works. Listen if you are interested.
    http://www.howstuffworks.com/podcasts/stuff-you-should-know.rss
    • thumb
      Jun 29 2012: This is an interesting perspective and something i have been wondering about because I recently had to terminate a relationship which was important to me because the lies about unimportant stuff distorted my world.
      • Jun 29 2012: Good thing you terminated the relationship Debra. There are some people that just lie. Pathological liars. I have found that people that lie just for the heck of it are not to be trusted. Most of these people are quite gregarious - entertaining folks. Many of them will use you anyway they can and it will be a one way street. They will also steal from you if they get the chance. They talk about what they are going to do for you, but they never quite get around to it. They will even tell lies about you to other people if it serves their purpose. Next to murder perhaps pathological lying comes next on the list of misdeeds.

        Your insight about "unimportant stuff distorted my world" was very telling. Pathological liars are known for creating their own reality.
        • thumb
          Jun 29 2012: Thanks for your helpfulness,Sandra.
        • thumb
          Jun 30 2012: In addition to "pathological liars...create their own reality", they probably have no room for others in their reality but themselves. =/
  • Jun 29 2012: Being truthful and living a life of truth is not the easy way. Many prefer the easy way which could in a way mean being tactful or not saying the truth.

    In most cases the truth that is twisted or presented in tactful manner as they call is definitely not truth.
    • thumb
      Jun 29 2012: I cannot agree that truth cannot be presented tactfully. I can say let's go brush our teeth, rather than your breath stinks, can't I?
      • Jun 30 2012: "let's go brush our teeth..." May smooth-over someone's fragile ego -- if they don't see the subtle switch. But if they do, then they know that you merely think them shallow. Now it may've been a long day and maybe there's a reason for stinky breath; maybe you could crinkle-up your nose, then ask them if your breath stinks too.

        "...your breath stinks," is fine if they know you really do care for them - and they have enough integrity to appreciate that care.
    • Steve C

      • +1
      Jun 30 2012: I think it's been said that the surest way to ruin the truth is to stretch it a little.
      Many do prefer the easy way, it seems. But perhaps they have their own hard choices.

      Truth that is "tactful" does not really seem like the truth - nor even the most important thing that could be said in a situation - "Your goldfish is dead," is useful knowledge; "I feel bad for you," may be more important.
      I think I'd appreciate a truth-teller. It only becomes pathological when they believe that the facts are more important than me.
      • thumb
        Jun 30 2012: Ah! That does put a new spin to the topic, "It only becomes pathological when they believe that the facts are more important than me", I was glad to read this.
        • Jul 4 2012: (Thanks for the +1, hope this helps you)
          I'll restate "...are more important than me," means "...pathological when... facts are more important than an equality of openheartedness." I think.

          Perhaps the pathological truth-teller is the "heads" to the "tails" of a pathological liar. Both may give a lot, but withhold what really matters.
  • thumb
    Jun 28 2012: If they were condemned to tell the truth I'd ask them what next week's lottery numbers were.
    • thumb
      Jun 28 2012: Tell the truth; not predict
    • thumb
      Jun 28 2012: Are you talking about the lottery makers David? =P

      That won't be possible because most lotteries are done by random, as far as my knowledge knows, it's still random even if we ask the lottery makers.
  • thumb
    Jun 27 2012: Hi Derek

    In building a Cathedral of Truth, they will be the Key-Stone to the Arch.
    Don
  • thumb
    Jun 27 2012: (1) Pathological suggests an abnormal behaviour; perhaps lacking integrity.
    Beware of danger.

    (2) I would tell the woman on her death bed, that her son is waiting for her.

    (3) As for the woman experimenting with clothes, I would tell her she is a looker. And give her score of 100; pause, reflect, then say, "and at 10 feet you look awful."

    Remember, I am just throwing ideas into the conversation.
    • thumb
      Jun 29 2012: I'm guessing you are single.
      • thumb
        Jun 29 2012: "do I look good in this" she asked.

        I have been married since 1954.

        She is beautiful to me at any distance. She is my soulmate, on occasion she was a little too devilish, and I did take off a few points.


        She has often said, I "was" the kindess man she has ever known.


        Joy, in all truth, you look beautiful in your picture.

        Don
        • thumb
          Jul 1 2012: I was only joking! And "my" picture is really my great aunt Pearl, but thank you!