TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

Are you a bioliberalist, bioconservative, or a transhumanist? And why?

Bioliberals believe that if human enhancements are used fairly and safely, then it is okay to enhance. It may even be our duty to enhance human life and erdicate suffering.

Bioconservates feels that human enhancements should be impermissible. It is too risky and in principle counter to human dignity. They feel that they a duty to NOT eliminate disease and aging

Transhumanists are all FOR human enhancements.

  • thumb
    Jun 21 2012: No,No, and No. I'm a damn it leave it alone accepet your place in the food chain and the eco system your not incontroll your just to stupid not to know it.
    • thumb
      Jun 21 2012: By your views, would you cure diseases or just accept they're there to kill you
  • thumb

    R H 30+

    • 0
    Jun 21 2012: "If man were meant to fly he'd have wings!" I think that answers the question.
    • thumb
      Jun 21 2012: if man was meant to communicate overseas he'd have telepathic ... wait ... we are on the internet right now
      • thumb
        Jun 21 2012: For some reason my thumbs up is currently defective but this comment and you deserve one. Although we often see issues differently, I always benefit and I think that the whole TED community benefits from your canny clarity and frank humour. you never fail to make me think more deeply. Thank you.Thank you!
  • thumb
    Jun 20 2012: Bioliberalism is the best stance to take, human advancement is going to be required, especially if we are to expand to space. And if we eliminate aging and someone will say this, "it will cause over population" well in this case we promote family planning, and try and get countries into stage 5 of the DTM or expand to space or build underground cities etc etc. Though by the time we get human genetic engineering sorted out I'd say population growth will have peaked an will have started to decline so no worries.