TED Conversations

Ricky Thompson

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Is modern day design/technology TOO user-friendly? Are we creating a 'plug-and-play' society?

If design and/or technology is highly user-friendly does it encourage the user to remain ignorant of how the design/technology works?

If technology far outstrips the mass of users in terms of sophistication does it mean that we never manage, as a whole, to exploit the full potential of design/technology?

For example, does it make sense that we all have home computers but the idea of programming is anathema to most of us?

How could we seek to raise the base level of understanding?

And does this trend of 'plug-and-play' understanding extend into other arenas such as, for instance, politics?

0
Share:
progress indicator
  • thumb
    Jun 25 2012: I am not adverse ti a plug and play society if it allows people to access technology to contribute in their own area of strength.
  • thumb
    Jun 19 2012: It depends what you're doing.

    I use video a lot with my students. It's fun and they are able to produce 'professional' looking presentations far easier than drawing and writing by hand (they are 7 year olds).

    While transitions and effects can be added quickly and easily, there is still loads of thought and preparation as well as editing and re-editing that goes into creating a quality piece of work - just as there is in producing a quality piece of writing, art, experiment, investigation and so on.

    Technology hasn't really impacted on the thinking that goes on behind projects - that's still the hard part (and what makes a success rewarding).

    Mind you, emotional impact is simple with video and a music overlay. People are suckers for schmaltz..
    • thumb
      Jun 19 2012: I kinda agree that technology may not have impacted on the thinking that goes on behind a project (although I guess it could at least be suggested that tech frees up the artist/creator to concentrate on the thinking behind a project).

      But I'm still unsure as to whether a certain kind of craftsmanship is being lost or if it's only changing.

      And on the schmaltz front, I agree - I think the Kony 2012 video that was such a success a couple of months ago is testament to how video and music overlay can have a massive impact that a message alone will not.
  • thumb
    Jun 19 2012: I do not agree that user friendliness will lead to lack of interest. there will always be people interested in how the stuff works and that is exactly why we have many programmers and creators. such concepts create more jobs.

    I can relate to your point and a good example of that I think is when people drive automatic gear shifting cars having no knowledge of clutch, engine rpm and differential energy division systems in a car. I have witnessed a thousand times that those who used to drive manual shifted cars and have knowledge of car mechanics are better drivers even on the automatic ones.

    another example is the new smartphones that hide all the operating systems and file structure stuff from the user, phones that I can never make myself use because I do not see what they are doing in the background. and I still prefer windows phone with open file structure that can be tweaked and changed according to my needs.

    I think technology has to move toward even more user friendliness but it must not make it a black box, transparency of a system and informing the user of background tasks can definitely be helpful.
    • thumb
      Jun 19 2012: Your car example is a very good example of what I am talking about.

      The more separated tech is from how it is used, the less people will tend to understand how it actually works. It becomes almost 'magical'.

      I think that they say that magic is simply technology we don't understand.
      • thumb
        Jun 19 2012: "magic is simply technology we don't understand". something tells me that i will use this sentence a lot from now on ...