This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
The biggest threat to mankind. What will end the world as we know ?
Does the world need to be saved ? Are we heading toward an inevitable extinction ? will that be a new generation bomb ? or will it be pollution ? will it be depletion of natural resources ? or will the machines be our killers as it is suggested in many sci-fi stories ?
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.














Don Wesley 50+
Ever get frustrated trying to change someone's belief system? We now have a new clue.
A little magic explanation has revealed the trick.
http://www.ted.com/talks/jonathan_drori_on_what_we_think_we_know.html
Well done Jonathan. Maybe we will inclined to think longer before we enter a debate, or launch a comment.
Sina Elli 10+
Thank you for sharing this wonderful talk with us Don.
robert hensley
That was a good video, I hadn't seen that one before.
Sina Elli 10+
"In clear water, red and infrared wavelengths of light are mostly absorbed, while blue and green wavelengths are mostly reflected. This reflection accounts for the blue-green color of water. For this scattering effect to occur, the water must be a minimum of 10 feet (3 meters) deep."
Source: UXL Science Fact Finder, ©1998 Gale Cengage
Don Wesley 50+
Your question is extending the conversation away from being on topic.
Do you not have an arguement to make. Extending, is called "Dishonest Argument."
peter lindsay 30+
Don Wesley 50+
You mention the topic of "saving the world." Are you not misdirecting this conversation.
More details like "blue seas on cloudy days" provides more opportunity for passive agression.
You said a few hours ago "to ignore and remain silent about things is to be a partner in crime but in today's world that ignorance is being rewarded, talking out loud costs. if only we could see how much more ignorance really cost."
Sina Elli 10+
pat gilbert 50+
http://www.ted.com/talks/kathryn_schulz_on_being_wrong.html
robert hensley
Don Wesley 50+
Her lesson is a valuable one, but very different.
pat gilbert 50+
How so?
robert hensley
It really was mostly a question, the closest thing to a sea by me is the gulf of mexico lol, I'm not sure that has ever been blue :-P. I did know why the sky was blue and with that I reasoned: if the sea wasn't blue then there may be some other factors effecting it.
But, you are quite right it was far from the topic, and I'm sorry about that :-(
*edtit--btw. my argument is that people need to question things more, thinking about them critically.
Don Wesley 50+
I welcome this opportunity to improve the effectiveness our conversations. There is nothing new here but perhaps we can agree here. Since we are not together around a table, with a chairman with a gavel, it becomes most important that we discipline ourselves to limit our comments so as to stay on topic. A short [off the top of my head] example could be the following.
1) Ideas - Throw out your ideas, stories, and expect others to listen; not challenge
2) Questions – ask one not several questions and expect an answer; not a debate
3) Debate - Once you get answer to one question then move on to a debate; an argument for or against the answer.
Extending an argument is a way to avoid the argument [knowing you can't win] and is called dis-honest argument.
Frequently going off at a tangent may also be called "poor thinking habits, or a mental problem"
Examine arguments with silent critical thinking and then put your own argument on the table and let it speak for itself.
Never insult someone for advancing a carefully prepared argument.
Thank a person for their story. Avoid communication by using things like :-P
I think applying the above thoughts results in kindness and its by products.
Obey No1kinobe 50+
robert hensley
The only part that I don't agree with fully is in extensions and tangents. Sometimes these two things can be used to further explain your idea/argument.
Examples: my questions about the sea were directly off topic, but also a strong part of what I have been saying will cause our destruction (and how we need to think more critically about everything). I also talked for a moment about mental and physical addiction in another reply on this topic. But, it was used as a tool to try and help relate the idea of money as a positive reinforcement system, by first disconnecting money from material.
I am however going to copy your post onto another page for my own use, because I believe these are all good things to stay constantly aware of. Anyone who is interested in communicating with the intent of understanding and possibly solving problems would be well advised to keep these thoughts close. Very good advice, thank you.
**edit, I would also like to add to your advice: Don't feed the trolls.