TED Conversations

David Bradley

Project Manager, ALPFA Institute

TEDCRED 500+

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

to grade people in high school on improvement vs. right or wrong

Would it not be a better idea to recognize improvement vs. intelligence? I know that there would have to be careful attention paid to bias, but It would seem to me that being recognized for how much better I am doing today than yesterday would be much more inspirational and make me think about how to do better. We could change a "C" from meaning average to meaning "the same", a "B" would mean better than before, and an A would mean even more improvement, a "D" would raise eyebrows as to why they are not as good as before.

Is it a problem with the student or the environment? Did I not teach this subject as well as I could have? etc.

Improvement based grading would give us a great barometer for our schools and our teachers, those students who may be ahead of the curve would have reason to excel, those that were perhaps behind would still remain confident in their decisions and learn better by having a more accurate rating of their skills.

We could use technology to create running charts of improvement and see trends over longer periods of time. I'm sure there would be other ways and I'd like to here your thoughts on this idea.

What do you think?

0
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Jun 16 2012: I agree with you David and Linda the trends are what you want to watch and this will not show up by just looking at grades.

    There is conduct that is appropriate with the trends E.G. if the graph skyrockets it is imperative to find out what you were doing that caused it to skyrocket and not take it for granted that you are just suddenly a genius the corollary of which is when it plummets don't take it for granted that you are a complete failure. Following the trends is an invaluable life skill that you would do well to teach to your students.

    I hear what Erik is saying but there gradations of knowing the material.
    • thumb
      Jun 16 2012: "there gradations of knowing the material." Not in my discipline.

      Would you really want go to the pharmacist that had the lower gradation of knowledge? How could you even tell? I don't know about you, but I would want the best.

      The discipline is what establishes minimum standards and that is for our safety.
      • thumb
        Jun 17 2012: Like I said I get it. But there are all sorts of levels above the minimal standards and below for that matter.

        What counts is the trends even after you have met the minimum standard, not for the authorities but for yourself.

        E.G. Your a salesman and yout average quota is 100 units a week, after a few weeks you start selling more. You analyze your schedule and your attitude and your policy and discover that the weeks that you sold more were weeks you started getting more sleep.

        From there you make a point of getting enough sleep and thingd go along and you discover that you start selling even more and do the analysis and discover coincident with the increased sales you were practicing what you learned in a Dale Carnegie course.

        Most people will not think to look at it this way but it is really the scientific method at work in the everyday world.
        • thumb
          Jun 17 2012: OK I get it now and I agree. We do this a lot with standardized testing. We analyze trends in student data and we also have students analyze their own trends. It is actually a very helpful tool especially when you have a marginal student. It is very objective and the student can see where their content weaknesses are and address them. They also can see how lack of sleep affects performance or distractions from families or relationships. I agree trending performance is a skill for the future.
      • thumb
        Jun 17 2012: Hoorah

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.