This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Does the lack of expression on the Muppets found on Sesame Street inhibit the transmission of ideas and morals that the show strives for?
The ability to properly convey a message is heavily based upon nonverbal cues. A puppet has a very limited ability to convey nonverbal cues. Does this make it harder for a child to understand the idea the Muppet is conveying compared to the same message conveyed by an human actor?
Topics:
Tutoring Kids communication














Debra Smith 200+
daniel hehir 20+
You could of course ask the same question about TV use with children in general. Regardless of the actor being human or a puppet. The TV set is a rather non-human form of communicating, especially with small children. It stimulates the child in a rather visual /audio that is rather unnatural when one sees the way the "entire being" of the child needs to learn... as you mention "moral ideas". In fact, there are some schools of though that say it is down right damaging to the young child. There are hundreds of other subtle things going on between the child as watcher and the TV set as teacher or entertainer.
I think puppets are a fantastic tool to teach children otherwise. I have used them a lot myself. But you have an interesting question anyway !
Linda Taylor 50+
In thinking about it, even when the character is limited in vocalizations such as in the Swedish Chef or Beaker or the Martian aliens, the puppeteers compensate for the lack of facial communication with increased physical communication. (I hope nobody asks the yip yip martian aliens for their papers).
In case you haven't noticed, I am a HUGE muppet fan:)
Zdenek Smith 100+
Debra Smith 200+
Zdenek Smith 100+
I think I am not an expert in this area at all so I am not sure but you might be right =)
Cheers