- Kyra Gaunt
- New York, NY
- United States
Adjunct Associate Professor, Baruch College-CUNY, Ford Foundatiion Postdoctoral Diversity Fellow
This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
How does the status quo design of student - faculty interactions diminish innovation in the classroom? How to hack higher ed?
This Live Conversation with TED Fellow Kyra Gaunt will open on June 15th, 1pm EDT.
Note: Conversation has been extended until June 17th.
There are many TED talks about innovation in education, but most focuses on K-12 education. There are also amazing talks about breaking the code on our relationship to work, to learning, and to our application of knowledge (aka wisdom).
Students call me Professor G. I am a professor of anthropology, ethnomusicology and racism studies. I am also a 2009 TED Fellow. My students in cultural anthropology are interested in engaging the TED community in a conversation around how to hack the design of the higher ed classroom where emerging adults and their supposed mentors, if a design was scalable, could truly become the consumers of their own productivity as students.
My aim as a professor is to help students realize they are great students, great citizens and great human beings NOW not after graduation.
To truly explore this question, we need diverse perspectives and we intend to discover the power of extending the classroom beyond its four walls with a weekly TED conversation around a question related to hacking the higher ed classroom.
What if the classroom interactions were designed for sustainability, for curiosity, and for innovating thinking? What would we talk about? What could we talk about? And wouldn't we talk about anymore?
Consider grading (but we do need so way to measure accurate thinking). Consider the power dynamics of the student-teacher conversation around grades, assignments, and dialogue. And consider the role of the repositories of knowledge and experience that often goes unnoticed, the students themselves.
Do we need textbooks anymore? Would Google and the students' experience be enough in an anthropology or social science course? #justaskin
Also consider issues of ethnic and gender representation relative to issues of power and training emerging adults to be leaders in a globalizing world.













Qiao Zheng
Furthermore, we still need traditional teaching tools such as textbook, homework and exam. Isaac Newton said that he saw further than others because he stood on the shoulder of giants. So we need read the textbook to learn what we don’t know and then explore the unknown. Moreover, we cannot be an armchair strategist. We need to turn our knowledge learned from the textbook and others into practice, and we need a way to test it. That is why we still need homework and exam.
Fritzie Reisner 100+
I continue to have trouble with the idea of a status quo design of student-faculty interactions, as I believe interactions vary depending on the personalities of the people involved, the subjects they teach, the emphasis in the institution of research relative to teaching, the typical load a teacher carries of courses in a year at that school, and so forth. I would guess that if one talks about typical scenarios, there will be more faculty student interaction at a liberal arts college or small state college than at a major research university, but I have seen a lot of individualized attention at major research universities as well.
Qiao Zheng
The classroom is a space for student to learn, to meet, to think. U-shape is one of the ideal classrooms that gives student a lot of inspires and emphasize the position of teacher/professor simultaneously. Student can discuss with each other face to face, and teacher is more freely to move and help them.
I am taking professor Gaunt’s Anthropology class this summer, and she is the most understanding, creative and friendly professor I’ve ever met. She is trying to encourage student to be the consumer of their own productivity by saying that “Hello, great ones” in the beginning of every class. It really helps students to have good start of a day and value themselves. On the other side, I like this small classroom for a summer course, and we did a lot of communications during class. Without doubt, it is the best way to meet new people and expand our social network. I had a lot of class which professor only focused on lecture, so I did know anyone after finished the whole semester. Prof G. uses Facebook, email and other NetTools to keep in touch with student, and she said she prefers student to text massage to her, so she can respond us as soon as possible. According to my personally experience, there are only few professors/teachers would like students to disrupt their private lives. Therefore, I can say professor Gaunt is the unique! She really cares about student, not only their grade but also their future!
Mark Hurych
How does the status quo design of student-faculty interactions diminish innovation in the classroom? How to hack higher Ed?
Socrates had a useful approach but I think demo, challenge, invite, and expand is appropriate and useful too. I have seen and used this on an elementary level, but it is a valid tool for any learning situation. Jazz musicians, surfers, and street skaters will get together and challenge each other this way. Take any performance, spoken poetry, song, game, and demonstrate it. Share the experience with a group interested in that activity. Challenge them to participate. Invite repeat performances. Allow each performance to build on the last and expand the repertoire of everyone.
What if the classroom interactions were designed for sustainability, for curiosity, and for innovating thinking? What would we talk about?
Singing and other performance art are their own conversation. Spoken word poetry is a case in point. (See Sarah Kay TED talk "If I Had A Daughter.")
The underlying principles seem to support what Michelle Holliday said about the pattern of living systems: 1) Diverse parts are required, the more diverse the better. 2) A unified whole is the focus of all. 3) Relationships matter. 4) Self-integration as a motivating force takes over.
Hack learning. Hack a sustainable future.
Jason Chan
Claire Taylor
Mike Robinson
“Our schools are, in a sense, factories in which the raw products (children) are to be shaped and fashioned into products to meet the various demands of life.” (Cubberley, 1917)
Many theorists, Ivan Illich for example, decry this system; indeed there are a plethora of critiques of institutional education and when writing my thesis I searched for empirical evidence supporting our system. I found nothing, except perhaps some self-indulgent musings by University Deans who figured that because they rose to the top within the system, that the system works!
So yes, we need to hack the system and stop stigmatizing students who for one reason or another do not, or can not jump through the hoops. We need to begin to provide relevant learning opportunities to all individuals interested in expanding their skills and awareness.
Thanks for the opportunity to share my perspective.
Isidra Person
Karl Gude
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Isidra Person
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Karl Gude
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Karl Gude
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/karl-gude/why-university-students-a_b_1382141.html
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Linda Taylor 50+
You bet I care. I care enough to have a do-over if they need it. And I encourage and support. I am available to help. But the work is theirs. Like Yoda said, "Do or do not. There is no try."
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Karl Gude
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Karl Gude
Karl Gude
I see teaching as somewhat parallel to parenting or managing a dept at a company. The instructor is in charge and sets the tone, and there are many things they can do to uplift students, to encourage participation and growth using simple rules like praising in public, criticizing in private.
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Linda Taylor 50+
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Jeremy Cull
Personally I would like to see more of the Socratic method used like it is in law school, but perhaps giving the student the option to discuss the subject later in private instead of in front of everyone else; what often prevents class participation is the other students. I think the immediate feedback for defending their line of thought on the spot is extremely important, and could be employed more often.
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Jeremy Cull
Karl Gude
Salandra Bowman
I agree with Dr. Gaunt, that even professors must make sure that they see themselves as still evolving and growing. Although they may be more grown, doing so highlights the process/journey rather than the end.
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Laurie Noe
Yiana Belcher
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Feyisayo Anjorin 50+
Classroom interactions provides means of sharing ideas among scholars and to gain from the diversity of perspectives.
Online interactions via a 'meeting' webpage could broaden the scope of scholar participation and raise fresh questions.
But without a doubt the internet has changed with way learning is done in recent years, and schools will do well to find ways to benefit immensely from this.
Now a lot can be learnt via online textbooks, online videos and even self-proclaimed professionals.
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Feyisayo Anjorin 50+
Linda Taylor 50+
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Linda Taylor 50+
I think part of the problem is that you cannot compromise innovation for accountability. That always needs to be part of higher ed. Accountability and integrity
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Linda Taylor 50+
What would be your thought process if those words came out of the surgeon instructing the doctor performing a procedure on your mother? Nobody is playing.
My students must become accomplished learners and quickly. They must know more than I can teach. In an average semester I am teaching out of 5000 pages of text in just 2 course. Yes 5K. They must have outstanding study skills and I need to measure their mastery and hold them accountable. That is a huge part of my accountability to my discipline. The bar is set by my discipline and translated into the classroom.
Or as I said, I'll see you next semester.
Innovation in my discipline is centered around simulation. High fidelity mannequins to assist the student in application of knowledge. We are finding limitations in the use outside of psychomotor application. It is useful iin the complex management of patients with multiple comorbidities but has limitations in the actual learning of content. I have seen some fabulous affective phenomena in students during simulation. Students crying after the mannequin 'dies' because of their error. The debriefing has to be done very carefully and the student must be assisted to frame the experience within the context of practice.
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Karl Gude
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Magdalena Rogowski
Karl Gude
Karl Gude
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Karl Gude
Everyone winds up in front of the class at some point. We do improv, even for serious topics. Anything to make the content more accessible and memorable
Salandra Bowman
This is a very timely conversation. I walked away because I just didn't believe in higher ed at the time. I did not enter a program and take a loan to be beat down, especially when I know that I do good work. I thought to myself, I could still be a writer and scholar without a PhD. But what about the students that are to come and need someone who values radical and transformative education? Without addressing the power dynamics between teachers and students and students and administrators, things like this will continue to happen. Simply put, I'm a human being first; grown black woman second, and student last. I expect to be treated as such.
When we discuss intersectionality, oppressions, and privileges, we often talk about race, class, and gender. Age usually falls on the end. If maturity has nothing to do with age, we must find a way to reconcile our educational politics to reflect such.
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Karl Gude
Kyra Gaunt 100+
Isidra Person
Kyra Gaunt 100+