TED Conversations


This conversation is closed.

Why is the Nick Hanauer talk not posted?

I haven't been a member for long, but I've been watching TED talks for years now consistently checking in for new videos. Frankly, the talks have gotten a little bland in the past few months. Then I hear through the grapevine of Nick Hanauer's lecture and how Mr. Anderson has decided to censor it. I'm extremely disappointed in the decision. This is an issue on the mind of many people in America and those interested in American politics and economics. It's an something that deserves to be heard by many more people than the elite TED audiences, and what better way to spread this worthy idea than posting the lecture online, sooner rather than later. The cited reason for omitting the lecture was that it was "too political." I have to say that is a terrible excuse. When has TED attempted to remain apolitical? Speakers have discussed societal ills like poverty and war; Jonathan Haidt has put forth an explanation of the psychological differences between the Republicans and Democrats; Sam Harris proposed science can substitute religion as a source of morality, and very early on in TED's history Richard Dawkins was allowed to promote militant atheism; other hot button political issues like contraception and climate change have been discussed here (often more than once); and all of these speakers had the video of their quite political talks posted. All of a sudden we can't view here a perspective on the issue of income inequality from Mr. Hanauer? I seem to remember Richard Wilkinson discussing a very similar topic posted back in October 2011. Mr. Anderson, I think a more substantial explanation is in order regarding your decision not to post Mr. Hanauer's talk online other than it being "too political." I can't speak for anyone else, but I see the decision as an act of cowardice reflecting on the organization as a whole. It suggests that we, the public, have lost TED as a forum for intellectual discussion and consideration regarding important issues, political or otherwise.


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    May 24 2012: They preceding definitions and sources cited, seemed to have offended a person. My apologies. I am accused of working magic or something like that--if only! :)

    However, I will state these are definitions posted in the name of furthering discussion---which has now been labeled by thsi person as a way to hide behind the issue??

    These are others definitions, not mine, and I offer them up in the spirit of the continuation of this thread for 6 more days and to help expand the discussion to the larger issues at play that have been brought up. I am simply a contributor that has been attacked on a personal level by what I consider trolling to intimidate contributors to leave the discussion.

    If the discussion if finished, fine, but if not, let's keep the ball in the air, despite the naysayers. Thanks to everyone for their participation in this forum TED provides. Does not mean they are excluded from the discussions. If my posts have been perceived as personal attacks, them please accept my most humble apologies, they were never intended as such.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.