TED Conversations

Brian Adam

TEDCRED 10+

This conversation is closed.

Why is the Nick Hanauer talk not posted?

I haven't been a member for long, but I've been watching TED talks for years now consistently checking in for new videos. Frankly, the talks have gotten a little bland in the past few months. Then I hear through the grapevine of Nick Hanauer's lecture and how Mr. Anderson has decided to censor it. I'm extremely disappointed in the decision. This is an issue on the mind of many people in America and those interested in American politics and economics. It's an something that deserves to be heard by many more people than the elite TED audiences, and what better way to spread this worthy idea than posting the lecture online, sooner rather than later. The cited reason for omitting the lecture was that it was "too political." I have to say that is a terrible excuse. When has TED attempted to remain apolitical? Speakers have discussed societal ills like poverty and war; Jonathan Haidt has put forth an explanation of the psychological differences between the Republicans and Democrats; Sam Harris proposed science can substitute religion as a source of morality, and very early on in TED's history Richard Dawkins was allowed to promote militant atheism; other hot button political issues like contraception and climate change have been discussed here (often more than once); and all of these speakers had the video of their quite political talks posted. All of a sudden we can't view here a perspective on the issue of income inequality from Mr. Hanauer? I seem to remember Richard Wilkinson discussing a very similar topic posted back in October 2011. Mr. Anderson, I think a more substantial explanation is in order regarding your decision not to post Mr. Hanauer's talk online other than it being "too political." I can't speak for anyone else, but I see the decision as an act of cowardice reflecting on the organization as a whole. It suggests that we, the public, have lost TED as a forum for intellectual discussion and consideration regarding important issues, political or otherwise.

Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    May 18 2012: FYI, Chris Anderson has a post on his blog about this: http://tedchris.posterous.com/131417405
    • thumb
      May 18 2012: haha, i'm glad to see that the seed of my backyard idea fell on fertile soil.
    • May 19 2012: My simple response to that is, if it so low merit that it might not convince anyone of its arguments.

      Why not post it, to enable good people like Krisztian to confirm it?

      That is no excuse in my book, I suggest TED to "swallow it up", live up to what they preach and bring it to bear for the public to condemn it, if it truly is partisan and has no merit. The people are not stupid. And it's not ted's job to serve as a censoring nanny regarding these issues.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.