May 31 2012:
Human development is more like a bar graph than a cumulative score. We all need people to advance as far as they can in their own area of strength. Sometimes that will mean that the mathematicians are way ahead of the phsicists and at another point the physicists will be waiting for the mathematicians (thereby alerting, informing and encouraging them into news areas of investigaion). We truly need both to be unfettered so that their brains can soar and lead us to new understandings.

May 12 2012:
O.K. thinking a little more. It seems more like should the language be more importan than the message?
There are many messages and more. Maybe so. Of course, for a Physicist the important thing is
the message: notwithstanding the relevant part of the language mathematics is required for
serious physics modern physics or engineering etc. We might choose our hero to be Newton,Charles
P. Steinmetz, Lord Keynes, Malthus, crick and Watson, van Newman, Leslie Groves, Deming, Copernicus,
etc.

May 12 2012:
I don't understand. Certain parts of mathematics are used in physics. Other parts are used in
business school. Look at taleb's books. We are talking about specific applications here. Maybe
I understand this better now. When I was younger I tired of all the proofs in pure mathematics.
But all of life isn't just canonballs and quantum mechanics. O.K. physics too is more than
that is. Perhaps we are talking about reality and a particular aspect of the language to describe
that view of reality, other sciencesuse mathematics, other uses, and things that are not real.

May 9 2012:
Your question is a bit like asking whether a tool box is more important than a mechanic. Each is fairly useless without the other. That's why many of the major branches of maths were developed by physicists.

May 7 2012:
I don't think that that's a good way to go about the relationship between the two. But, math is a major component in just about everything in our daily lives. What is physics without math?

May 7 2012:
Mathematics is partly the language in which physical models are summarized. Problem solving in physical terms can use physical reasoning, experiment, or use of mathematics as a sort of parallel, symbolic form for expressing relationships. These are not necessarily alternsatives, but enter best into different situations.

Mathematics is not only the language of science, though, having ideas and structures in it that have use of beauty independent of physical meaning. Mathematics is the language of models in economics as well, for example, but mathematics has theoretical dimensions that do not have immediate application to the physical world.

I don't see how you could call one more important than the other, or why one would want to. Not everything in our experience needs to be ranked and measured.

TED Conversations Archives

We’ve spent three years sharing Ideas, Debates and Questions — and learned a lot.

Now we’re going on hiatus to retool and rebuild from the inside out for a better conversation experience.

## Debra Smith

## george lockwood

There are many messages and more. Maybe so. Of course, for a Physicist the important thing is

the message: notwithstanding the relevant part of the language mathematics is required for

serious physics modern physics or engineering etc. We might choose our hero to be Newton,Charles

P. Steinmetz, Lord Keynes, Malthus, crick and Watson, van Newman, Leslie Groves, Deming, Copernicus,

etc.

## george lockwood

business school. Look at taleb's books. We are talking about specific applications here. Maybe

I understand this better now. When I was younger I tired of all the proofs in pure mathematics.

But all of life isn't just canonballs and quantum mechanics. O.K. physics too is more than

that is. Perhaps we are talking about reality and a particular aspect of the language to describe

that view of reality, other sciencesuse mathematics, other uses, and things that are not real.

## Mateusz Jaszak

## peter lindsay

## Muhammad Maruf

## Alan Huckle

## Daxesh Degdawala

## Fritzie -

Mathematics is not only the language of science, though, having ideas and structures in it that have use of beauty independent of physical meaning. Mathematics is the language of models in economics as well, for example, but mathematics has theoretical dimensions that do not have immediate application to the physical world.

I don't see how you could call one more important than the other, or why one would want to. Not everything in our experience needs to be ranked and measured.