TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

Is there room for God in science (Creationlism vs Evolution)?

1)Do you believe in one, both or none?
2)Why do you believe it (them)?
3)Does your belief(s) prove others wrong? How so?
4)Is there room for God in science? Or is it
unreasonable to mix the two?


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    May 8 2012: Didn't you know? God is dead!

    Man lives, man creates.
    • May 8 2012: Well I'm convinced by that pithy rebuttal.

      But wait...here's an update! Chaos Reigns. A talking fox said so in a creepy movie. Check and mate, eh Brute?
    • May 9 2012: In 1882 Friedrich Nietzsche proclaimed that God was dead. The Bible is to this day the best selling book every year. Just thought this would be an intersting thing for you to know.

      If you want to make an argument, you're going to have to use more than ten words to make it a convincing one.
      • thumb
        May 9 2012: Is God dead?
        To be dead the remains sure had to be alive before.
        God, called upon as the creator of all in existence including life cannot be alive itself nor dead for that matter.

        Nietzsche referred to the God of man, the object of their devotion during the middle ages had become a social process. It had become a lifeless exercise of prayer, church attendance and festivals around the year obliged to everyone that would participate within society. The fire was dead and almost no one did bother much what it was all about. Those that posed questions were expelled from church as well as society, they were strange and suspicious. I think Nietzsche comprised that feeling in the notion that God had died. The imagery that ever drove people to built the world we live in had become a dull habit.

        To have a Bible to many is part of that habit. Hardly anyone ever reads in it they only swear by it.
        To proof yourself right in your believe in whatever it may be, you can quote from most any book.
        Science is an attempt to understand the world with our mind and to test that understanding to the actual world. It produced more wonders to the human eye than religion ever claimed.

        Religion has nothing to do with science then adapt to it to survive.
        • May 9 2012: Thanks for taking the time to explain your point.

          My only response is that a majority of people look through a cloudy lens when generalizing a religion. The only time religion is noticed by the media is whenever there's a small radical group or something that puts it in a bad light. People only pay attention to religion when it makes said religion look bad. For Christianity, people see Westboro Baptist Church and assume that they represent the majority of Christians. For the longest time after 9/11, there was a collective mentality that all Muslims were terrorists. And so on and so forth.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.