TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

Do you think that examinations are an adequate way to determine the ability of students?

I believe that testing students ability solely through examinations is not a fair way to represent each students true capabilities. Each person learns differently and equally each person demonstrates their knowledge differently, some people excel in presenting their knowledge orally, others do extremely well in exam conditions. In my opinion too much rests upon whether a student does, or does not, do well in their exams and it is not fair on those who would do equally as well but in a more practical 'as it applies in real life' approach. Do you agree? And How could we make 'testing' students fairer?

I do realise that in many subjects courseworks are required and contribute to the final grade however, I find that exams do make up the largest percentage of the overall grade/achievement. How could we tailor assessments to emphasise the abilities of each individual student and not just the few who do well in exam setting?


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • May 17 2012: I think examinations are an adequate way to determine ability of students. Because, if students have learned the subjects and worked hard, they want to determine how many percentages of them, they could understand. It doesn't matter this examination is orally or written. If students could have understood all the materials very well, examinations are really enjoyable things for them. I think examinations make you fell self-confident, if you have good knowledge. Just for me it is very good way!

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.