TED Conversations

John Locke

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

What have you done to help the Earth?

In honor of Earth Day, I have a question for everyone on TED.com. What have you done to benefit the Earth? Have you recycled, started a club, raised awarness about the Earth's condition, turned down your heating and cooling ststem? Whatever you have done to help the Earth, I want to you post it right here. And, if you haven't done anything to help the Earth than write about something that you plan on/want to do in the near future.

Who knows, maybe it will inspire more people to contribute to saving our planet!

Topics: Earth environment
+4
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Apr 24 2012: Jake and Colleen: I am sure that you are both sweet, liberal and concerned citizens and I mean that quite sympathetically. I hope that includes me too. We are people oriented and don't kick dogs (god forbid!).

    But when we think about improving the world, we can't be hemmed in by our lack of power to then urge effective ways to make change. At least we have to aim for a deep understanding, even if we aren't in positions of power.

    The people who control big money and national legislation don't satisfy themselves with choosing one type of green bean over another. Change is not merely personal to them. They move you and I around like pawns. They make sure that hundreds of millions of people all get the same message and perform the same actions that make them money and accrue their power.

    in the resource field, this takes the form of first of all, making sure that they can get lots of resources all around the globe for pennies. This may take war, or bribing officials, or loans with harsh terms made to impoverished countries, but the resources are sure to be cheaply available.

    Then they actively design their products to make use of those cheap resources - metals, oil, plastic, natural products - and to fall apart as soon as possible. The theory is that you will rush out and buy one more new piece of crap. And it works for them. The key is DESIGN TO FAIL. They even shamelessly call it planned obsolescence.

    Powerless individuals then look to escape the net by buying one item designed to fail slightly less quickly rather than another item designed to fail as soon as the warranty expires. It can't work.

    The only way to change this is to look behind the curtain at the Wizard who is doing the design and CHANGING THE WAY GOODS ARE DESIGNED.

    We need to design for perpetual reuse, not for discard. Sound scary? If you say yes, you really have been swept up into the system. I have proven how easy it really is to design for reuse by doing it and presenting it publicly.
    • thumb
      Apr 24 2012: Paul,
      With all due respect, sweet, liberal, and being people who do not "kick dogs" is not the topic here.

      Cut the crap, and lets hear..." What have you done to help the Earth?".

      That is the topic of this discussion...not interested in your gloom and doom. I am very aware of facts, and they are not "scary". If they are to you....so be it!
    • thumb
      Apr 25 2012: Paul, as with everyone, I do appreciate your comments but like Collen Steen said, the main point of this conversation was what have you done to help the World and/or what are you doing to make it a better place. Perhaps you have a plan to change the way things are since you obviously dislike them...?
      • thumb
        Apr 25 2012: What have I done? Are you guys kidding? I've been working actively on resource conservation for thirty years. First I started a chemical company that found new uses for all of the chemicals being excessed (that's Zero Waste talk for being thrown away) in Silicon Valley. All of them! Not some dirt simple paper and plastic but CHEMICALS. Isopropyl alcohol, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, trichloroethylene, butyl acetate, xylene, freon, cellosolves, triton x-100 and lots more. Then we took all of the laboratory chemicals that were being excessed (that means packed into steel drums with vermiculite and buried in deep pits where they remain to this day and for the next hundred thousand years) and we resold all of them to new users for half price. We had the largest inventory of lab chemicals in California. When Dow Chemical in Pittsburg CA closed its huge stockroom, we took all of those lab chems and made them available for new users to buy for half price. Ditto with the excess lab chemicals (mostly unused and unopened) coming out of Lawrence Berkeley labs.

        Then I wrote the only book in existence on Zero Waste showing how to apply the same principles I had developed to the entire panoply of poorly designed commodities, in the same way that we had worked with chemicals.

        Then I started to develop a gigantic website called the Zero Waste Institute with analyses of how resource despoliation and conservation really work, scientifically, not just the first superficial ideas.

        Along the way I testified at conferences and joined lawsuits. I wrote papers. The EPA produced three studies of my work. I also reused the entire Baldwin Park Superfund. All the dirt, wood, plastic, copper, steel and mercury. At 20% of the cost of the idiot garbage companies.

        So glad you asked. Does your city have a Zero Waste resolution in place? Probably does. I invented the term. Check Wikipedia.

        So what have you done?

        http://www.zerowasteinstitute.org

        Try dipping in there this time.
        • thumb
          Apr 25 2012: Hi, quick observation Paul.

          It seems that you are advertising for an admirable cause, but I think you assume that because you support a great cause that you can be condescending. I am sure that you have good intentions, but I think you should try to get off your high horse once in awhile. Your lack of empathy is really starting to make me feel like you are here to guilt everyone into an amazing idea or you are just denouncing any other ideas that isn't your own.

          Paul, you should try to spread an idea through reciprocity, not jamm it down our brains. I am sure your current method works with politicians and other stubborn monetary driven institutions. Please Paul, I want to read/hear your thoughts without feeling that you are figuratively slapping me or maybe this is an ingenous way to make connections with your audience?

          I am sorry, but I just can't ingest these ideas while I am being insulted or watching others be insulted as well.

          I hope that the next plan of action is that we all holster our emotions and try to be civil.

          Thanks for reading my thoughts and I hope we can have a nice transition. =)
        • thumb
          Apr 25 2012: I was not kidding Paul,
          So far, the comments I've seen that you have written on TED seem to be condescending, and critical of other people's comments, rather than expressing your own thoughts/feelings regarding the topics. Critizing what others do, or do not do, is not very productive or interesting to read Paul.

          In your recent comment, you tell us what YOU are doing... "I've been working actively on resource conservation for thirty years". That is GREAT Paul, and I respect your contribution to the health of the earth that we all share:>)
    • Apr 25 2012: Paul, I loved your explanation, and the background information you provided in your well thought out answer.

      Congratulations on, not only identifying the harm others are doing, but doing something about it. As the last sentence of your comment clearly states: " I have proven how easy it really is to design for reuse by doing it and presenting it publicly."

      You were kind to come back and elaborate on demand........Your message was not lost on me.
      Thank you very much

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.