- Abhay Kashyap
- Buffalo, NY
- United States
This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Is fighting for religion any different from a generic form of fighting for supremacy with respect to territory or resources?
Fighting for religion has been a long fought battle similar to fighting for land and resources. It is human nature, as social animals, to fight for supremacy as individuals and as social groups. This behavior is instinctive in all life which is a necessity for survival.
Is it possible for humans to ever overcome their instinct to fight?
Criticizing only religion in particular only touches the surface of a bigger problem of fundamentalism. People should encourage rational thought process but we have to ask ourselves if humans can ever put aside differences.
How can we impart education onto children where the emphasis is more on critical thinking rather than gaining knowledge alone?













Anna Hoffmann
Even though religions also are dividing into new sects and movements, what they deal with is all and everything.... And they are interested in YOU, as an individual.
So we might just need to develop a new religion that all humans can share and that does not oppose critical thinking. One that can be used as a firm base to stand or sit on while asking your question.....(until the next earthquake...)
Derek Payne
Mark Meijer 100+
*** "Fighting for religion has been a long fought battle similar to fighting for land and resources. It is human nature, as social animals, to fight for supremacy as individuals and as social groups. This behavior is instinctive in all life which is a necessity for survival."
-> In fact I think religion and ideology has often been used as an excuse to fight for land and resources and supremacy.
*** "Is it possible for humans to ever overcome their instinct to fight?"
-> I'm convinced that it is possible at least to live in abiding peace with our impulses and not be slaves to them. But it takes mostly some initial insight and motivation to see how and why, and then often some initial persistent effort to kickstart that engine of cultivation practice, so to speak. Any other hurdles along the way can be overcome, so I think the big question is, how do people get that initial insight and motivation. Because that appears to be an act of grace that is impossible to induce on demand.
*** "Criticizing only religion in particular only touches the surface of a bigger problem of fundamentalism. People should encourage rational thought process but we have to ask ourselves if humans can ever put aside differences."
-> Rational differences can be worked out. As soon as it becomes an issue of some fundamentalist absolute, there is no stopping it. Obviously religion and ideology have been iconic examples of that, although as mentioned I think those are often just used as a manipulative tool by elitists in power to get the people behind them in their conquest for more banal purposes.
*** "How can we impart education onto children where the emphasis is more on critical thinking rather than gaining knowledge alone?"
-> Research the "seven liberal arts", in particular the trivium (which are the first three, followed by the remaining four called the quadrivium), and ask why it has been largely abandoned (except in sophist Ivy League schools apparently).
gale kooser 20+
Abhay Kashyap
gale kooser 20+
To try & answer your question: A large part of me feels we do need some form of beliefs, even if it is just a belief in our own selves. Tough Question.
Mark Meijer 100+
Austin Seay
Austin Seay