This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Is matter basic?
In hopes to get more input on the subject of consciousness, I am posing this question because I feel it gets to the root of the 'hard problem.' if matter truly is basic then figuring out consciousness seems to become finding the solution to the 'easy problems,' which are not even all that easy. I feel as though this questions creates the relevant divide between deflationary theories and any other viable explanations of consciousness and I'm am curious as to what these explanations would be, or if a deflationary theory is the more logical solution based on our current world view.
Thanks!














Robert Galway 20+
Were I to have lived my entire life in a coma, kept alive by a machine, I would exist, but have no sense of self. The physical manifestation of my being would exist, but my consciousness and self-awareness would not exist.
Consciousness, awareness, sensory input, and the life learning journey towards awareness of self are all needed to have a consciousness. The journey has to start at birth, but where you want to draw the line about self-awareness levels and consciousness is a bit arbitrary.
In a related thought, the definition of self-awareness also probably changes as man has evolved through time to a higher level.
Ken brown 30+
Heres a conversation that took place last week that delt with consciousness for A.I,you might find it helpful as there was alot of input.
http://www.ted.com/conversations/9837/can_technology_replace_human_i.html
unless you took part in it.